On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Mark Glines wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:07:18 -0700
> chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Monday 04 June 2007 12:49:45 Mark Glines wrote:
> >
> > > (the LD_LIBRARY_PATH bit is required on freebsd so parrot can find
> > > libparrot.so.)
> >
> > The GNU linker sup
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:13:36 -0500
Joshua Isom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a little prodding around, I think the problem is that the
> dynops aren't build with the rpath. I don't know how "proper" the
> following patch is(i.e. linux doesn't seem to have a problem so
> either this is right o
# New Ticket Created by Joshua Isom
# Please include the string: [perl #43133]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43133 >
After a little prodding around, I think the problem is that the dynops
aren't build with
# New Ticket Created by Mark Glines
# Please include the string: [perl #43130]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43130 >
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:07:18 -0700
chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 04 Ju
# New Ticket Created by Jonathan Worthington
# Please include the string: [perl #43131]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43131 >
Mark Glines wrote:
> I tried the perl6 testsuite on freebsd at Coke's request, a
# New Ticket Created by Mark Glines
# Please include the string: [perl #43132]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43132 >
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:39:08 +0100
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As
After a little prodding around, I think the problem is that the dynops
aren't build with the rpath. I don't know how "proper" the following
patch is(i.e. linux doesn't seem to have a problem so either this is
right or the other way is right), but it does the trick.
Index: config/gen/makefiles
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:39:44 -0700
"Parrot via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> This message has been automatically generated in response to the
> creation of a parrotbug regarding:
> "Re: GC bug on freebsd/x86, triggered by a perl6 tes
On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:39:08 +0100
Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Assertion failed: (s->encoding && s->charset
> > && !PObj_on_free_list_TEST(s)), function string_hash, file
> > src/string.c, line 2024. Abort trap (core dumped)
> >
> I'm betting that it's the !PObj_on_free_l
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 13:07:18 -0700
chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 04 June 2007 12:49:45 Mark Glines wrote:
>
> > (the LD_LIBRARY_PATH bit is required on freebsd so parrot can find
> > libparrot.so.)
>
> The GNU linker supports a flag to mark a relocatable shared library.
> From
Mark Glines wrote:
I tried the perl6 testsuite on freebsd at Coke's request, and
discovered a test that fails on freebsd but succeeds on linux. The
test seems to be a GC-related assertion failure; parrot -G does not
crash, parrot without -G does crash.
...
Assertion failed: (s->encoding && s->
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #43129]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43129 >
On Monday 04 June 2007 12:49:45 Mark Glines wrote:
> (the LD_LIBRARY_PATH bit is required
On Monday 04 June 2007 12:49:45 Mark Glines wrote:
> (the LD_LIBRARY_PATH bit is required on freebsd so parrot can find
> libparrot.so.)
The GNU linker supports a flag to mark a relocatable shared library. From my
Makefile:
-Wl,-rpath=/home/chromatic/dev/parrot/blib/lib
I don't know
13 matches
Mail list logo
