On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 02:49:01PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote:
> It's applied; just resync.
Same make warnings as before. But the tests are now all:
$ perl5.6.1 -Ilib t/op/basic.t
1..2
Invalid type in pack: 'q' at assemble.pl line 77.
not ok 1 - branch_ic
# Failed test (Parrot/Test.pm at li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Dougherty) writes:
[...]
> That's because assemble.pl hasn't been patched yet to use the right
> pack_type. You can either apply my patch from yesterday [...]
If you sign up for an account at http://dev.perl.org/auth/account I am
sure that Dan and Simon will let me flip
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:22:50AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > That's because assemble.pl hasn't been patched yet to use the right
> > pack_type. You can either apply my patch from yesterday or you can
> > hand-patch the pack_type for 'i' to be 'q'.
>
> This one?
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Don't forget that this patch requires the configure patch by Brent that was
just a couple of messages back.
-Original Message-
From: Michael G Schwern
To: Andy Dougherty
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 9/20/2001 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: Complete failure on Linux/PowerPC with 64bit ints.
O
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:03:45AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > But if we run Configure.pl with bleadperl that *does* use 64bit ints
> > and has debugging flags on, there's trouble.
>
> > And all of the tests fail with "This isn't Parrot bytecod
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> But if we run Configure.pl with bleadperl that *does* use 64bit ints
> and has debugging flags on, there's trouble.
> And all of the tests fail with "This isn't Parrot bytecode!"
That's because assemble.pl hasn't been patched yet to use the right
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:30:34AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> And all of the tests fail with "This isn't Parrot bytecode!"
That's what I like to see. Thanks.
--
I've looked at the listing, and it's right!
-- Joel Halpern
