Re: Coding standards (was Re: typedefs)

2002-03-22 Thread Bryan C. Warnock
On Friday 22 March 2002 19:40, Nicholas Clark wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:55:00AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Besides, struct etc. are their own namespace, aside from the normal > > variables/functions namespace. No need for any pre/postfix at all. > > Until someone wishes to em

Re: Coding standards (was Re: typedefs)

2002-03-22 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:55:00AM +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Besides, struct etc. are their own namespace, aside from the normal > variables/functions namespace. No need for any pre/postfix at all. Until someone wishes to embed the public headers into a C++ program. Or finds themselves

Re: Coding standards (was Re: typedefs)

2002-03-22 Thread Segher Boessenkool
"Bryan C. Warnock" wrote: > > On Friday 22 March 2002 17:53, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Brent Dax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Parrot_Foo for external names, FOO for internal names, struct > > > parrot_foo_t for struct names. > > > > POSIX reserves all types ending in _t. I'm not sure th