At 6:38 PM -0500 1/25/04, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
On Sunday, January 25, 2004, at 06:01 , Matt Fowles wrote:
Of late it seems that everybody has been throwing around their own
little homegrown benchmarks to support their points. But many
people frequently point out that these benchmarks are fla
Gordon Henriksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would be nice if there were a convenient way to run the lot of them
> collect the timing information, though.
Yep. That would be really great. That is: have per platform numbers over
time (correlated to patches) about performance of current and a lot
On Sunday, January 25, 2004, at 06:01 , Matt Fowles wrote:
Of late it seems that everybody has been throwing around their own
little homegrown benchmarks to support their points. But many people
frequently point out that these benchmarks are flawed on one way or
another.
I suggest that we add
A few notes on the benchmarks can be found/added here
http://www.vendian.org/parrot/wiki/bin/view.cgi/Main/
ParrotDistributionExamples#benchmarking
Mike
On 26 Jan 2004, at 00:14, Luke Palmer wrote:
Matt Fowles writes:
All~
Of late it seems that everybody has been throwing around their own
lit
Matt Fowles writes:
> All~
>
> Of late it seems that everybody has been throwing around their own
> little homegrown benchmarks to support their points. But many people
> frequently point out that these benchmarks are flawed on one way or another.
>
> I suggest that we add a benchmark/ subdire
