Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-24 Thread steve
On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 12:27:31AM -0400, Jeff wrote: > brian wheeler wrote: > > > > I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It > > basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and > > when an include is found, the included file is unshifted to the >

Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-22 Thread brian wheeler
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 20:12, Jeff wrote: > brian wheeler wrote: > > > > Its not backwards, it does the right thing. > > Okay, I believe you now :) I was thinking that the insert was done at > the beginning of the -file-, not the insertion point of the file. If you > haven't committed, feel free

Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-22 Thread Jeff
brian wheeler wrote: > > Its not backwards, it does the right thing. Okay, I believe you now :) I was thinking that the insert was done at the beginning of the -file-, not the insertion point of the file. If you haven't committed, feel free to do so. I shouldn't have stuck my nose in :) > The

Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-22 Thread brian wheeler
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 13:06, Jeff wrote: > Clinton A Pierce wrote: > > > > At 09:37 PM 6/21/2002 -0500, brian wheeler wrote: > > >I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It > > >basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and > > >when an include is

Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-22 Thread Jeff
Clinton A Pierce wrote: > > At 09:37 PM 6/21/2002 -0500, brian wheeler wrote: > >I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It > >basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and > >when an include is found, the included file is unshifted to the > >begin

Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-22 Thread Clinton A. Pierce
At 09:37 PM 6/21/2002 -0500, brian wheeler wrote: >I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It >basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and >when an include is found, the included file is unshifted to the >beginning. To the beginning? Do we have

Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-21 Thread Jeff
Daniel Grunblatt wrote: > > Err, Jeff just told me to see the -E flag. Which may not be well-documented. It expands the macros and constants (and now include files) and stops at that stage, returning the postprocessed text on STDOUT. I'll add documentation for this shortly... -- Jeff <[EMAIL PRO

Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-21 Thread Jeff
brian wheeler wrote: > > I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It > basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and > when an include is found, the included file is unshifted to the > beginning. > > Should I commit it? > > Brian Feel free, as lo

Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-21 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
Err, Jeff just told me to see the -E flag. Daniel Grunblatt. On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, Daniel Grunblatt wrote: > It would be cute if you change the debugger to load all the included files > as well. > > Daniel Grunblatt. > > > On 21 Jun 2002, brian wheeler wrote: > > > I've implemented a .include d

Re: .include directive for new assembler

2002-06-21 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
It would be cute if you change the debugger to load all the included files as well. Daniel Grunblatt. On 21 Jun 2002, brian wheeler wrote: > I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It > basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and > when an inc