Re: [perl #58636] Re: [perl #58812] Tcl Segfaults parrot

2008-09-14 Thread Will Coleda
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:55 PM, chromatic via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 12 September 2008 19:48:30 Will Coleda wrote: > >> After many weeks away from tcl, I tried to do a make test today >> (r31046) and found a segfault. >> >> I can't easily generate PIR to narrow it down, because

Re: [perl #58812] Tcl Segfaults parrot

2008-09-13 Thread chromatic
On Friday 12 September 2008 19:48:30 Will Coleda wrote: > After many weeks away from tcl, I tried to do a make test today > (r31046) and found a segfault. > > I can't easily generate PIR to narrow it down, because even the --pir > option is segfaulting. > > doing a build and just running "../../pa

Re: [perl #58812] Tcl Segfaults parrot

2008-09-13 Thread Will Coleda
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 9:33 AM, François PERRAD via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat Sep 13 06:01:58 2008, coke wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:54 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Friday 12 September 2008 19:48:30 Will Coleda wrote: >> > >> > >> > Rough guess: you have a

Re: [perl #58812] Tcl Segfaults parrot

2008-09-13 Thread Will Coleda
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:54 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 12 September 2008 19:48:30 Will Coleda wrote: > >> After many weeks away from tcl, I tried to do a make test today >> (r31046) and found a segfault. >> >> I can't easily generate PIR to narrow it down, because even t

Re: [perl #58812] Tcl Segfaults parrot

2008-09-12 Thread chromatic
On Friday 12 September 2008 19:48:30 Will Coleda wrote: > After many weeks away from tcl, I tried to do a make test today > (r31046) and found a segfault. > > I can't easily generate PIR to narrow it down, because even the --pir > option is segfaulting. > > doing a build and just running "../../pa