On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Wed Sep 10 09:30:37 2008, doughera wrote:
> >
> > That's another easy one. The test assumes that all platforms have -lrt
> > and that all platforms have to link with it for this test. Your system
> > clearly doesn't have -lrt, so the link f
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Tue Sep 09 15:14:36 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Generally agreed. In this case, hold this ticket for the I/O milestone,
> > which is next (sometime in the next few days). I've added it to the I/O
> > tasklist.
> >
> > In the mea
Will Coleda wrote:
Instead of spending time fixing a probe that isn't being used, we
should rip it out. If we eventually need it again, we can start from
here, but there's no point in probing for features that we never use.
It's wasting developer (and less importantly, CPU) time better spent
els
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Parrot's also not using AIO anywhere either, so the whole probe is kind of
> > pointless right now.
>
> Instead of spending time fixing a probe that isn't being used, we
> should
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Parrot's also not using AIO anywhere either, so the whole probe is kind of
> pointless right now.
Instead of spending time fixing a probe that isn't being used, we
should rip it out. If we eventually need it again, we can
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 08:46:33AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Parrot's also not using AIO anywhere either, so the whole probe is kind of
> pointless right now. Mainly, I was just hoping that a minor fix would
> help solve Patrick's problem of Configure.pl hanging during the aio probe.
> I
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, chromatic wrote:
> On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:19:56 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>
> test_17787.c: In function 'main':
> test_17787.c:45: error: 'SIGRTMIN' undeclared (first use in this function)
> test_17787.c:45: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
On Saturday 06 September 2008 20:19:56 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Sat Sep 06 16:46:08 2008, doughera wrote:
> > > ... what *else* would I need to have AIO available on Darwin?
> >
> > It looks like you already have it available. If you try with my patch in
> > verbose mode, what, exactly, go
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Thu Sep 04 19:22:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > FWIW, here is a data point: What happens on my Darwin/PPC (10.4) Mac at
> > auto::aio:
> >
> > On Darwin, Configure.pl reports that AIO is unsupported.
>
> Follow-up question: If I 'loc
I'll try this out on Darwin and (Debian) Linux this weekend and see what
happens. Thanks.
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:52:34PM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> > I applied the patch attached, aio.in.revised.patch.txt, in r30771. I
> > set the 'sleep' to 4 seconds. All the tests have been reactivated.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > This is a patch
> This is a patch in the sense of "bandaid". What is it about the letter
> 'K' that means that this probe gives sloppy results on Kubuntu when on
> Ubuntu it has built cleanly for me every day since I started
Something to do with KDE vs Gnome, since that's the major difference?
Perhaps KDE's scr
>
> This is a patch in the sense of "bandaid". What is it about the letter
> 'K' that means that this probe gives sloppy results on Kubuntu when on
> Ubuntu it has built cleanly for me every day
Something to do with Gnome, since that's the major difference between the
two?
--
Email and sh
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 04:52:34PM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> I applied the patch attached, aio.in.revised.patch.txt, in r30771. I
> set the 'sleep' to 4 seconds. All the tests have been reactivated.
Thanks.
> This is a patch in the sense of "bandaid". What is it about the letter
> 'K
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 08:31:10AM -0700, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Thu Sep 04 06:33:41 2008, pmichaud wrote:
> > I just wanted to comment that I see this problem on my Kubuntu system as
> > well -- when running Configure.pl, I consistently get to the step for
> > AIO and things hang (until I
On my OpenSuse, it looks like this:
auto::aio - Does your platform support AIO...wrong signal
..done.
So the fact that it exits the loop early, just makes it continue to the "wrong
signal" indication, and that marks it as not supported. After all it did not
meet the te
James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Mon Aug 25 13:15:16 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generally recommend attaching patches as files ending in .patch (as
documented in docs/submissions.pod) for the sanity of the patch
monsters.
Well, since it's in the docs, I will withdraw the suggestion.
Howev
On Monday 25 August 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Thu Aug 14 06:03:27 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On my computer (OpenSuse 11.0) the Parrot Configure.pl hangs forever
> > when
> > checking for platfom support for AIO.
> > It appears to be a neverending sleep(1) loop in the check.
> >
Allison Randal wrote:
James Keenan via RT wrote:
3. For future reference, submit bug reports to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I recommend beginning Subject line with:
[BUG]. And I recommend submitting patches as email attachment ending in
: .txt (because that seems to render best in browsers, mail,
James Keenan via RT wrote:
3. For future reference, submit bug reports to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I recommend beginning Subject line with:
[BUG]. And I recommend submitting patches as email attachment ending in
: .txt (because that seems to render best in browsers, mail, news
interfaces).
Ge
20 matches
Mail list logo
