On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 22:18 +0200, Peter Gibbs wrote:
> typedef HUGEINTVAL(*sprintf_getint_t) (PARROT_INTERP,INTVAL,
> SPRINTF_OBJ *);
>
> So, since obj->getint returns a HUGEINTVAL, I gave it one to store the
> result in.
Fair enough, that's good enough for me.
> As to why sprintf_obj is
- Original Message -
From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: [perl #57260] [BUG] Segfaults in sprintf opcode
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Peter Gibbs via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Peter Gibbs via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christoph Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 6:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [perl #57260] [BUG] Segfaults in
- Original Message -
From: "Christoph Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 6:43 PM
Subject: Re: [perl #57260] [BUG] Segfaults in sprintf opcode
Will Coleda wrote:
Once we get a core parrot test for this, we can close out the ticket.
Thanks!
- Original Message -
From: "Geoffrey Broadwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Gibbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Christoph Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 6:09 PM
Subject: Re: [perl #57260] [BUG] Segfaults in spr
Will Coleda wrote:
Not only that does that avoid the segfault, the tcl spec test
equivalent to the first test passes. Woot.
The second is still failing, but probably due to unicode issues - but
it's now just failing, not segfaulting.
Once we get a core parrot test for this, we can close out th
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 13:40 +0200, Peter Gibbs wrote:
> +HUGEINTVAL num;
Does this really need to be a HUGEINTVAL? Why is INTVAL not sufficient?
-'f
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Peter Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Christoph Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [perl #57260] [BUG] Segfaults in sprintf opc
- Original Message -
From: "Christoph Otto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [perl #57260] [BUG] Segfaults in sprintf opcode
Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string:
[p
Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #57260]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57260 >
Tripped over these trying to run some spec tests for Tcl. I
10 matches
Mail list logo
