Re: [perl #49276] [TODO] Refactor tools/util/smokeserv-server.pl

2008-11-15 Thread Allison Randal
Will Coleda wrote: Is the smoke server still used? Can support for the smoke server be dropped? +1 from me; I vote for smolder. +1, on not maintaining two independent solutions for the same problem. Allison

Re: [perl #49276] [TODO] Refactor tools/util/smokeserv-server.pl

2008-11-15 Thread Will Coleda
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To my way of thinking, deprecation is for parrot features, not > developer tools, so I don't think we need to follow the same rules > here. (But if I'm overruled, we need to decide before the release this > Tuesday.) > > I w

Re: [perl #49276] [TODO] Refactor tools/util/smokeserv-server.pl

2008-11-15 Thread Will Coleda
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:28 AM, James Keenan via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri Nov 14 11:42:02 2008, bernhard wrote: >> On Mo. 16. Jun. 2008, 16:50:13, coke wrote: >> > On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > > While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, i

Re: [perl #49276] [TODO] Refactor tools/util/smokeserv-server.pl

2008-11-14 Thread Will Coleda
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Bernhard Schmalhofer via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mo. 16. Jun. 2008, 16:50:13, coke wrote: >> On Wed Jan 16 03:41:56 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > While the fix to my particular problem is simple enough, it is >> apparent >> > that there's enough bit