On Nov 4, 2007, at 3:13 AM, Cosimo Streppone via RT wrote:
However, just out of curiosity...
Would the attached test work as well?
I replaced all the code that does the "hand-testing" of auto::gcc
with the automated `test_step_thru_runstep()' function.
IIUC, that function does exactly what th
James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Cosimo,
>
> The more I look at this, the more I wonder whether the test failure in
> 111-auto_gcc-01.t (reported below) has anything to do with the presence
> or absence of gdbm on one's OS or whether one's Perl was build with gdbm
> or not.
>
I'm sorry. I now realiz
chromatic wrote:
I bet that Cosimo's test.ldo file says "couldn't link with -lgdbm" or
something similar. I see the same failure; here's what's in my test.ldo:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgdbm
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
For whatever reason, this test file is trying
On Saturday 03 November 2007 07:32:21 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> The more I look at this, the more I wonder whether the test failure in
> 111-auto_gcc-01.t (reported below) has anything to do with the presence
> or absence of gdbm on one's OS or whether one's Perl was build with gdbm
> or not.
James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Cosimo Streppone wrote:
>> # New Ticket Created by Cosimo Streppone
>> # Please include the string: [perl #47127]
>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
>> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47127 >
>
>> Just found out
Cosimo Streppone wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Cosimo Streppone
# Please include the string: [perl #47127]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47127 >
Hi,
I'm trying to get my feet wet with parrot.
Welcome!
