Re: [perl #46601] PIO May Need to Mark PObjs

2008-06-07 Thread chromatic
On Thursday 05 June 2008 22:10:22 Will Coleda via RT wrote: > > ParrotIOLayers are going away, to be replaced by a class and C-level > > roles. It does bring up a good point that C-level roles will need a > > way to modify the 'mark' vtable function of the composed class. We can > > probably make

Re: [perl #46601] PIO May Need to Mark PObjs

2007-10-22 Thread Allison Randal
chromatic (via RT) wrote: However, it does mean that if we keep up this line of thinking, we do need a way to identify ParrotIOLayers that hold PObj pointers and mark those pointers during DOD. ParrotIOLayers are going away, to be replaced by a class and C-level roles. It does bring up a go