On Tuesday 25 September 2007 15:05:21 Bram Geron wrote:
> Reasoning from this model, I can't see what from_ctx is for. After
> solving one exception, there is no place that uses the value of
> from_ctx. So if a piece of code uses that context, it's stored at
> another place and that place should r
Mehmet Yavuz Selim Soyturk wrote:
>> -if (cc->from_ctx)
>> -Parrot_free_context(interp, cc->from_ctx, 0);
>
>
>> -Parrot_free_context(INTERP, from_ctx, 1);
>
>
> I don't know much about this context stuff, so maybe I don't see
> something, but how are those conte
Am Sonntag, 23. September 2007 20:19 schrieb Bram Geron:
> To test if 'from_ctx' is redundant, I tried removing the field and all
> accesses to it, and no extra tests failed (see patch).
Did you run a memory leak test? The from_ctx is refcounted for some reason.
leo
> -if (cc->from_ctx)
> -Parrot_free_context(interp, cc->from_ctx, 0);
> -Parrot_free_context(INTERP, from_ctx, 1);
I don't know much about this context stuff, so maybe I don't see
something, but how are those contexts freed after your patch?
