Juergen Boemmels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If nobody objects I will commit this change tomorrow.
I really thought that stuff is already committed - but obiously isn't -
my bad. A minute ago I had checked in build system changes WRT languages
to use parrot instead of imcc.
This will for sure co
;; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [RfT] Configure/Makefile changes towards Borland C++ Builder
>
>
> > I tried the first way: substitute before interpolation. This means all
> > uservariables need to substitute slas
- Original Message -
From: "Juergen Boemmels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Steve Fink'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: [RfT] Co
"Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Steve Fink:
> # > Following things were done:
> # > - s,/,\${slash},g
> #
> # Ugh. How difficult would it be to have Configure do this rewriting
> # automatically? (Or rewrite to whatever it is you need, instead)? This
> # just clutters up the makefiles a
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What if we just used unix-style paths in the *.in files, as in your
> solution, but explicitly marked all paths as paths?
What about a somewhat more abstracted description of dirs and files and
autogenerate makefiles for different platforms with some templa
On Sep-19, Brent Dax wrote:
> Steve Fink:
> # > Following things were done:
> # > - s,/,\${slash},g
> #
> # Ugh. How difficult would it be to have Configure do this rewriting
> # automatically? (Or rewrite to whatever it is you need, instead)? This
> # just clutters up the makefiles a little too m
Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sep-18, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
>
> > Following things were done:
> > - s,/,\${slash},g
>
> Ugh. How difficult would it be to have Configure do this rewriting
> automatically? (Or rewrite to whatever it is you need, instead)? This
> just clutters up th
Steve Fink:
# > Following things were done:
# > - s,/,\${slash},g
#
# Ugh. How difficult would it be to have Configure do this rewriting
# automatically? (Or rewrite to whatever it is you need, instead)? This
# just clutters up the makefiles a little too much, IMO.
Well...
It's theoretically pos
On Sep-18, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
> Following things were done:
> - s,/,\${slash},g
Ugh. How difficult would it be to have Configure do this rewriting
automatically? (Or rewrite to whatever it is you need, instead)? This
just clutters up the makefiles a little too much, IMO.
> - remove of && in
