Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Leopold Toetsch writes:
Must be soemthing wrong here. Output is now totally messed up.
It's possible that your terminal isn't wide enough.
80 columns is wide enough for me ;)
Indeed, something needs to be modi
chromatic wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 05:15, Luke Palmer wrote:
-system "$pathes{$names[$i]} $directory/"
- . "$benchmark.$suffixes[$i][$j]"
- . '>/dev/null';
File::Spec has a devnull() method. I'd use that to improve portability,
though
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 05:15, Luke Palmer wrote:
> -system "$pathes{$names[$i]} $directory/"
> - . "$benchmark.$suffixes[$i][$j]"
> - . '>/dev/null';
File::Spec has a devnull() method. I'd use that to improve portability,
though I'm never sure how
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch writes:
>>
>> Must be soemthing wrong here. Output is now totally messed up.
> It's possible that your terminal isn't wide enough.
80 columns is wide enough for me ;)
> Indeed, something needs to be modified to keep the output to 72 column
Leopold Toetsch writes:
> Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's a patch that prettifies parrotbench's output. It also redirects
> > errors to /dev/null, and replaces them with !!! in the output. The
> > benchmarking program is not the correct place to debug errors.
>
> Must be soemth
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a patch that prettifies parrotbench's output. It also redirects
> errors to /dev/null, and replaces them with !!! in the output. The
> benchmarking program is not the correct place to debug errors.
Must be soemthing wrong here. Output is now totall
