On Feb 28, 2006, at 21:59, Tim Bunce wrote:
This can happen if the machine is busy.
Okay. Can't the test be made more robust? Or emit a warning note?
Probably yes with increased testing time (longer sleep) - a warning
note is always ok.
leo
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 03:37:23PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2006, at 14:59, Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> >FYI I saw this once but haven't been able to repeat it:
> >
> >t/dynoplibs/myopsok 6/7
>
> This can happen if the machine is busy.
Okay. Can't the test be ma
On Feb 28, 2006, at 14:59, Tim Bunce wrote:
FYI I saw this once but haven't been able to repeat it:
t/dynoplibs/myopsok 6/7
This can happen if the machine is busy.
leo
FYI I saw this once but haven't been able to repeat it:
t/dynoplibs/myopsok 6/7
# Failed test (t/dynoplibs/myops.t at line 107)
# got: '1
# alarm1
# 2
# alarm2
# 3
# alarm3
# alarm1
# alarm3
# alarm3
# 4
# alarm3
# alarm3
# 5
# don
