On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote:
> In order to make that work you have required the lexer to pass you the {space}
> markers. That makes the parser do a lot more work throwing them away.
>
> It can also easily stop grammar being LALR(1) and hence yacc/bison
> parsable - you burn off yo
Garrett Goebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>From: Nick Ing-Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>> In order to make that work you have required the lexer to
>> pass you the {space}markers. That makes the parser do a lot
>> more work throwing them away.
>>
>> It can also easily stop grammar bei
From: Nick Ing-Simmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> In order to make that work you have required the lexer to
> pass you the {space}markers. That makes the parser do a lot
> more work throwing them away.
>
> It can also easily stop grammar being LALR(1) and hence yacc/bison
> parsable - you b
Bryan C . Warnock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>> With each box being replaceable, and the process being freezable between
>> boxes. The lexer and parser probably ought to be separated, thinking about
>> it.
>
>Not necessarily. It might be dangerous to
