On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 12:42 PM +0200 3/15/02, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> >Does this correspond with the general Parrot philosophy? Any
> >other objections?
>
> Did you look at PDD 6? Most of this is already spec'd out.
>
You mean "PDD 6: Parrot Assembly Language"? Do you imply
At 12:42 PM +0200 3/15/02, Shlomi Fish wrote:
>Does this correspond with the general Parrot philosophy? Any
>other objections?
Did you look at PDD 6? Most of this is already spec'd out.
--
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Many of the languages (if not most) that are planned to be implemented
above Parrot are lexically-scoped. The methodology to implement such
behaviour on top of an otherwise non-LS VM was described by Abelson and
Sussman in the book "Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs":
http://mitp
