At 04:31 PM 8/11/00 -0400, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> >
> > I'm thinking instead of proposing that lists become first-class data
> > elements themselves, lazily evaluated. That way we don't flatten until
> > someone actually references the list, which makes returns cheaper too.
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
> I'm thinking instead of proposing that lists become first-class data
> elements themselves, lazily evaluated. That way we don't flatten until
> someone actually references the list, which makes returns cheaper too. In
> this case we'd push two array markers on the stack, s
