On Thursday 13 September 2001 18:26, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 10:21 AM 9/13/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> >Dan Sugalski writes:
> > > >Lines 249 to 261 seem to duplicate 204 to 216.
> > >
> > > D'oh! Thanks, fixed.
> >
> >Oh man, good luck building a unit testing system for the docs :-)
>
On Thursday 13 September 2001 18:26, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 10:21 AM 9/13/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> >Dan Sugalski writes:
> > > >Lines 249 to 261 seem to duplicate 204 to 216.
> > >
> > > D'oh! Thanks, fixed.
> >
> >Oh man, good luck building a unit testing system for the docs :-)
>
On Wednesday 12 September 2001 17:45, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I just checked PDD 6 into CVS. (parrot/docs/parrot_assembly.pod) Some
> changes since last time, so check it out to see what's up.
>
> Dan
Lines 249 to 261 seem to duplicate 204 to 216.
Buggs
=
At 10:21 AM 9/13/2001 -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Dan Sugalski writes:
> > >Lines 249 to 261 seem to duplicate 204 to 216.
> >
> > D'oh! Thanks, fixed.
>
>Oh man, good luck building a unit testing system for the docs :-)
That's actually an interesting thing to consider. We could check for
d
Dan Sugalski writes:
> >Lines 249 to 261 seem to duplicate 204 to 216.
>
> D'oh! Thanks, fixed.
Oh man, good luck building a unit testing system for the docs :-)
Nat
At 06:07 PM 9/13/2001 +0200, Buggs wrote:
>On Wednesday 12 September 2001 17:45, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > I just checked PDD 6 into CVS. (parrot/docs/parrot_assembly.pod) Some
> > changes since last time, so check it out to see what's up.
> >
> > Dan
>
>Lines 2
I just checked PDD 6 into CVS. (parrot/docs/parrot_assembly.pod) Some
changes since last time, so check it out to see what's up.
Dan
--"it's like this"---
Dan Sugalski even samur
