Re: Notes on removing stack.ops, further steps

2008-04-22 Thread jerry gay
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Tonight I resolved RT#52838 and RT#52840, eliminating the > > saveall/restoreall > > opcodes, the register stack, and fixing up t

Re: Notes on removing stack.ops, further steps

2008-04-22 Thread Will Coleda
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tonight I resolved RT#52838 and RT#52840, eliminating the saveall/restoreall > opcodes, the register stack, and fixing up tests and other items > to avoid save/restore/etc. opcodes. > > I've also created a "users

Re: Notes on removing stack.ops, further steps

2008-04-22 Thread Klaas-Jan Stol
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tonight I resolved RT#52838 and RT#52840, eliminating the saveall/restoreall > opcodes, the register stack, and fixing up tests and other items > to avoid save/restore/etc. opcodes. > > I've also created a "users

Notes on removing stack.ops, further steps

2008-04-21 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
Tonight I resolved RT#52838 and RT#52840, eliminating the saveall/restoreall opcodes, the register stack, and fixing up tests and other items to avoid save/restore/etc. opcodes. I've also created a "userstack" branch where I've got the details for removing the rest of stack.ops . I've already im