# New Ticket Created by Leopold Toetsch
# Please include the string: [perl #27200]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27200 >
Stephane Peiry wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:07:48AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:07:48AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Yep. That's a bit complicated. The jit code tries to avoid
>> loading/storing the same register from/to memory.
> Actually on this, while looking at what jit on i386 would give for this
>
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:07:48AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Yep. That's a bit complicated. The jit code tries to avoid
> loading/storing the same register from/to memory.
Actually on this, while looking at what jit on i386 would give for this
particular loop, just noticed it does quite a lo
Stephane Peiry wrote:
Looking at it makes it pretty clear why it loops forever (mainly
it jumps back to a load, loading always the same value).
Yep. That's a bit complicated. The jit code tries to avoid
loading/storing the same register from/to memory. This is achieved by
remembering the size o
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:08:55AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I see. Your libc's sprintf seems to be missing the "0x" prefix for the
> "%p" format.
Ok you were right, that fixed it immediatly, and I'm now able to
see "within jit" :). Attached are the dumps for this loop, with
and without the
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mh ok, I do get the stabs file, and apparently the reason no objfile gets
> created is that "as" complains with loads of warnings and some errors when
> given the stab file.
I see. Your libc's sprintf seems to be missing the "0x" prefix for the
"%p" fo
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 06:19:42PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> If that runs and it works you get a stabs file (for parrot -d -j). This is
> compiled via an hardcoded line with "as". s. jit_debug.c
mh ok, I do get the stabs file, and apparently the reason no objfile gets
created is that "as" c
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:35:02PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>>docs/debug.pod /jit
> saw that one, but jit doesn't generate a .o file under sparc?
Calling Parrot_jit_debug() is enabled for __GNUC__ and __IBMC__. If your
system doesn't define one
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:35:02PM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>docs/debug.pod /jit
saw that one, but jit doesn't generate a .o file under sparc?
Stéphane
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> whats a good way to debug jit?
s. docs/jit.pod /Debugging
docs/debug.pod /jit
> Thanks,
> Stephane
leo
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:48:09AM +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> I don't know suns JIT code nor the assembler syntax, but it seems that
> the two subcc lines are broken:
>
> emitm_subcc_r(NATIVECODE, MAP[1], emitm_g(0), emitm_g(0));
>
> If I understand that correctly it should read:
>
>
Stephane Peiry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While playing with JIT on Suns, I've found out that the following pasm code:
> set I1, 2
>LOOP: sub I1, 1
> ifI1, LOOP
> print "end\n"
> end
> never finishes.. that is: parrot -j loop.pasm hangs fore
Hi All,
While playing with JIT on Suns, I've found out that the following pasm code:
set I1, 2
LOOP: sub I1, 1
ifI1, LOOP
print "end\n"
end
never finishes.. that is: parrot -j loop.pasm hangs forever (never printing
'end') while the non-jitted
13 matches
Mail list logo
