Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh well. I'm committing a fix for the bug, as well as resolving all
> shift/reduce conflicts via precedence.
Thanks for the fix. Funnily I encountered that same bug yesterday night
too, when trying to comment an argv param ...
> I didn't bother allowing li
On Sep-28, Steve Fink wrote:
>
> I've attached a diff to languages/imcc/t/syn/pcc.t, but I'm not sure
> if that's the right place for the test.
Oops. Except CVS is being very flaky right now, so the patch hadn't
been written to the file before I sent it.
Oh well. I'm committing a fix for the bug
I am getting strange behavior from IMCC if the first line after
.pcc_sub is a comment. It seems to misinterpret things and ends up
emitting a restore_p op that triggers a "No entries on UserStack!"
exception.
I've attached a diff to languages/imcc/t/syn/pcc.t, but I'm not sure
if that's the right
