On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> > Object Instantiation
> > Dan had a moment of clarity and declared that the Parrot Way to
> > instantiate an object in class Foo will be:
> >
> > new P5, .Foo
> >
> > All we need now is a working implementation. And, apparently, knowin
Luke Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do worry about some long-running daemon that uses anonymous classes
> heavily. It's possible that after quite some time, we'd run out of
> integers,
Its the same problem as assigning PIDs to a process. We will have to
cycle around and reuse old "free" n
On Oct 28, 2003, at 3:56 PM, Luke Palmer wrote:
Object Instantiation
Dan had a moment of clarity and declared that the Parrot Way to
instantiate an object in class Foo will be:
new P5, .Foo
All we need now is a working implementation. And, apparently,
knowing
what class a
> Object Instantiation
> Dan had a moment of clarity and declared that the Parrot Way to
> instantiate an object in class Foo will be:
>
> new P5, .Foo
>
> All we need now is a working implementation. And, apparently, knowing
> what class a class is a member of might be ha
