> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:11:42AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Actually the ops=>C conversion was conceived to do exactly what's being
> > done now--to abstract out the body of the opcodes so that they could be
> > turned into a switch, or turned into generated machine code, or TIL'd. If
> >
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:11:42AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Actually the ops=>C conversion was conceived to do exactly what's being
> done now--to abstract out the body of the opcodes so that they could be
> turned into a switch, or turned into generated machine code, or TIL'd. If
> you're
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:24:19PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 01:08 PM 9/20/2001 -0700, Damien Neil wrote:
> >Another approach would be to include a means of defining information
> >that must be included by the file implementing the ops. For example:
>
> I like that approach. I'd say go for
At 01:08 PM 9/20/2001 -0700, Damien Neil wrote:
>Another approach would be to include a means of defining information
>that must be included by the file implementing the ops. For example:
>
> HEADER {
> #include
> }
>
>This would then be placed into interp_guts.h. (Possibly surrounded
>by
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 11:11:42AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Actually the ops=>C conversion was conceived to do exactly what's being
> done now--to abstract out the body of the opcodes so that they could be
> turned into a switch, or turned into generated machine code, or TIL'd. If
> you're
At 12:07 AM 9/20/2001 -0700, Damien Neil wrote:
>I'm not at all certain what to do with things outside the opcodes
>themselves. The .ops => .c conversion was clearly originally
>concieved as translating one file into another. In order to dispatch
>ops via a switch, you need to pull out only the
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 12:15:37AM -0400, Michael Fischer wrote:
> please see attached process_switch.pl
> notes inside.
I've been working on the same thing. For comparison, I'm attaching
generate.pl, my replacement for build_interp_starter.pl,
process_opfuncs.pl, and make_op_header.pl. (I agre
please see attached process_switch.pl
notes inside.
Very rough draft, but I think it does write a correct
define ( but I might be clueless ).
On the note of the enum for the case foo:
Made it work, Gibbs has seen patch, but we wanted to
defer to Dan/Simon because op.h has the knack of
redefini
