Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So why does the generated pasm work where the PIR doesn't?
The generated PASM is all one compilation unit. Your (local) labels are
fixed up properly. In your PIR code you had local labels (w/o)
underscore refering to different compilation units.
> I can
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ Continuation usage ]
> Dan? Could you mandate this? Please?
As long as there are no usage patterns that precisely describe how
Continuations should work and how a PIR syntax could look like, there is
little to mandate ;)
> Preserving self and the curren
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> So, I'm trying to get my head 'round parrot's continuations. It's my
>>> understanding that, at creation time, a Continuation closes over the
>>> current user sta
Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, I'm trying to get my head 'round parrot's continuations. It's my
>> understanding that, at creation time, a Continuation closes over the
>> current user stacks, control stack and lexical pad (and possibly
Piers Cawley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I'm trying to get my head 'round parrot's continuations. It's my
> understanding that, at creation time, a Continuation closes over the
> current user stacks, control stack and lexical pad (and possibly some
> other stuff but those'll do for now).
Yes
I don't know about the continuation stuff, but you can't assume that
running imc --> pasm --> exec does the same thing as imc --> exec. I
ran into that before, and I don't think its going to get fixed until
the new imcc lands, at which point old-school pasm might even be
gone (although I don't know
So, I'm trying to get my head 'round parrot's continuations. It's my
understanding that, at creation time, a Continuation closes over the
current user stacks, control stack and lexical pad (and possibly some
other stuff but those'll do for now).
So, it seems to me that the following code should p
