Bryan C. Warnock sent the following bits through the ether:
> Interesting read. Dan skimmed over this, but what do .NET (and JVM) doe
> for floating point numbers?
For the JVM:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/vmspec/2nd-edition/html/Concepts.doc.html#19511
"The floating-point types are float and
At 7:21 PM +0530 10/20/02, Gopal V wrote:
If memory serves me right, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
> It looks like we're going to need 8,16,32,64 bit types...
Interesting read. Dan skimmed over this, but what do .NET (and JVM) doe
for floating point numbers?
IL (Ecma-335)
--
134.
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> I think so. I'm going to add in some conversion ops for the shorter
> float forms, and for the partial-sized integers. I'm unsure at the
> moment whether I want to commit to full 64 bit integers in I
> registers. On the one hand it means a lot more can be done at the low
> le
"Bryan C. Warnock" wrote:
> Interesting read. Dan skimmed over this, but what do .NET (and JVM) doe
> for floating point numbers?
The CLI has three floating point types, of which 2 are visible
to C# and a third is used by the engine. These are "float32",
"float64", and "native float". The firs
If memory serves me right, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
> > It looks like we're going to need 8,16,32,64 bit types...
>
> Interesting read. Dan skimmed over this, but what do .NET (and JVM) doe
> for floating point numbers?
IL (Ecma-335)
--
134.1.1 Floating Point
14 The floa
If memory serves me right, Leon Brocard wrote:
> It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
> Parrot. Could be interesting:
> http://www.dotgnu.org/pipermail/developers/2002-October/008345.html
A condensed summary of the IRC meetings have been posted as :-
http://www.dotgnu.org
Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
> It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
> Parrot. Could be interesting:
It was quite interesting. I managed to make it to the early one and
Dan to the later one. An "annotated and abridged chatlog" is available:
http
On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 07:39, Leon Brocard wrote:
> Leon Brocard sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
> > Parrot. Could be interesting:
>
> It was quite interesting. I managed to make it to the early one and
> Dan to the la
At 1:38 PM +0100 10/18/02, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rhys Weatherley) writes:
int x = ...;
int y = (short)x;
The value of x is truncated to 16 bits, and then sign-extended
to int. I'm looking for something like the "conv.i2" instruction
in IL, or "i2s" in JVM.
One co
Rhys Weatherley wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
[ imcc ]
Yes, I saw that. I haven't yet decided whether to generate pasm
or imcc directly from cscc. I did have some problems getting
"test_spilling.imc" to work. Is this a known issue?
Now yes ;-) Last cleanup changes did break the spillin
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:54:08PM +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
> It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
> Parrot. Could be interesting:
> http://www.dotgnu.org/pipermail/developers/2002-October/008345.html
The author of that mail needs to learn the difference between GMT and
At 5:54 PM +0100 10/18/02, Leon Brocard wrote:
Rhys Weatherley sent the following bits through the ether:
DotGNU is currently reaching out to other projects in the OSS/FS
world to see how we can help you and how you might be able to
help us.
It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will
Rhys Weatherley sent the following bits through the ether:
> DotGNU is currently reaching out to other projects in the OSS/FS
> world to see how we can help you and how you might be able to
> help us.
It looks like the DotGNU weekly IRC meeting will be discussing
Parrot. Could be interesting:
htt
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>
> > > What is the size of the "int" type? Will it always be 32 bit
> > > or is it "whatever is best for the machine"?
> >
> > It's a Configure option.
>
> That may be a bit of a problem, as C# (and Java for that matter)
> i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rhys Weatherley) writes:
> int x = ...;
> int y = (short)x;
>
> The value of x is truncated to 16 bits, and then sign-extended
> to int. I'm looking for something like the "conv.i2" instruction
> in IL, or "i2s" in JVM.
One concievable way to do that is basically have
Brent Dax wrote:
> # I'm a bit confused as to how one creates a user-defined class
> # in Parrot, and makes virtual method calls, accesses fields,
> # and what-not. I can't seem to find a good example (Cola does
> # non-virtual methods only at present).
>
> You don't, at least not yet. Eventual
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Have a look at imcc, which is our high level assembler. imcc does
> register allocation and (currently little) optimization. perl6 produces
> IMCC code. imcc can also run the code or write PBC files.
Yes, I saw that. I haven't yet decided whether to generate pasm
or imcc
Rhys Weatherley sent the following bits through the ether:
> The Portable.NET C# compiler, cscc, is very extensive, and is
> capable of generating output for multiple bytecode formats (IL
> and JVM are currently supported, more or less).
Oh, excellent. If you're already targeting both then it sho
Hi,
I'm Rhys Weatherley, the author of Portable.NET, which is part
of the DotGNU project. (Put down that flame thrower! I come
in peace. :-) )
DotGNU is currently reaching out to other projects in the OSS/FS
world to see how we can help you and how you might be able to
help us. One of the proj
Rhys Weatherley wrote:
The Portable.NET C# compiler, cscc, is very extensive, and is
capable of generating output for multiple bytecode formats (IL
and JVM are currently supported, more or less).
Have a look at imcc, which is our high level assembler. imcc does
register allocation and (curre
Rhys Weatherley:
# I'm Rhys Weatherley, the author of Portable.NET, which is
# part of the DotGNU project. (Put down that flame thrower! I
# come in peace. :-) )
Hey. Don't worry--we're not worried about DotGNU. On the other hand,
if you said you were on the actual .Net development group, it
21 matches
Mail list logo
