On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
> Martin D Kealey wrote:
> > [Frank Farance's paper] "specification based extended integer range"
> > [at] http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG14/docs/c9x/extended-integers/.
> Very interesting proposal. I wish they had adopted it. Would
> have saved me
Martin D Kealey wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone else followed the discussion in comp.std.c about
> integer types, prior to the adoption of the C99 standard? There was a
> substantial paper put out by Frank Farance, entitled "specification based
> extended integer range" or SBEIR for short; see
At 6:25 PM -0400 10/21/02, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 15:11, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Okay, I'm about ready to just bite the bullet and declare that
INTVALs have to be 64 bit integers.
Which INTVALs?
I registers.
INTVAL, IMHAOSBRPO[1], is overused internally.
I see little re
At 3:59 PM -0700 10/21/02, Brent Dax wrote:
Dan Sugalski:
# Okay, I'm about ready to just bite the bullet and declare that
# INTVALs have to be 64 bit integers.
#
# Does anyone know of a platform that has neither native nor emulated
# 64 bit integers? (One we're likely to run on, rather)
Mac Clas
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I'm about ready to just bite the bullet and declare that
> INTVALs have to be 64 bit integers.
>
> Does anyone know of a platform that has neither native nor emulated
> 64 bit integers? (One we're likely to run on, rather)
I'm fairly new to Parrot
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 15:11, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, I'm about ready to just bite the bullet and declare that
> INTVALs have to be 64 bit integers.
Which INTVALs? INTVAL, IMHAOSBRPO[1], is overused internally.
I see little relative performance and size damage if INTVAL is made 64
bits and re
Dan Sugalski:
# Okay, I'm about ready to just bite the bullet and declare that
# INTVALs have to be 64 bit integers.
#
# Does anyone know of a platform that has neither native nor emulated
# 64 bit integers? (One we're likely to run on, rather)
Mac Classic processors and Palm DragonBalls?
By t
Okay, I'm about ready to just bite the bullet and declare that
INTVALs have to be 64 bit integers.
Does anyone know of a platform that has neither native nor emulated
64 bit integers? (One we're likely to run on, rather)
--
Dan
---
