On Sat, Jun 22, 2002 at 12:27:31AM -0400, Jeff wrote:
> brian wheeler wrote:
> >
> > I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It
> > basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and
> > when an include is found, the included file is unshifted to the
>
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 20:12, Jeff wrote:
> brian wheeler wrote:
> >
> > Its not backwards, it does the right thing.
>
> Okay, I believe you now :) I was thinking that the insert was done at
> the beginning of the -file-, not the insertion point of the file. If you
> haven't committed, feel free
brian wheeler wrote:
>
> Its not backwards, it does the right thing.
Okay, I believe you now :) I was thinking that the insert was done at
the beginning of the -file-, not the insertion point of the file. If you
haven't committed, feel free to do so. I shouldn't have stuck my nose in
:)
> The
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 13:06, Jeff wrote:
> Clinton A Pierce wrote:
> >
> > At 09:37 PM 6/21/2002 -0500, brian wheeler wrote:
> > >I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It
> > >basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and
> > >when an include is
Clinton A Pierce wrote:
>
> At 09:37 PM 6/21/2002 -0500, brian wheeler wrote:
> >I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It
> >basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and
> >when an include is found, the included file is unshifted to the
> >begin
At 09:37 PM 6/21/2002 -0500, brian wheeler wrote:
>I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It
>basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and
>when an include is found, the included file is unshifted to the
>beginning.
To the beginning? Do we have
Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
>
> Err, Jeff just told me to see the -E flag.
Which may not be well-documented. It expands the macros and constants
(and now include files) and stops at that stage, returning the
postprocessed text on STDOUT. I'll add documentation for this shortly...
--
Jeff <[EMAIL PRO
brian wheeler wrote:
>
> I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It
> basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and
> when an include is found, the included file is unshifted to the
> beginning.
>
> Should I commit it?
>
> Brian
Feel free, as lo
Err, Jeff just told me to see the -E flag.
Daniel Grunblatt.
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
> It would be cute if you change the debugger to load all the included files
> as well.
>
> Daniel Grunblatt.
>
>
> On 21 Jun 2002, brian wheeler wrote:
>
> > I've implemented a .include d
It would be cute if you change the debugger to load all the included files
as well.
Daniel Grunblatt.
On 21 Jun 2002, brian wheeler wrote:
> I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It
> basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and
> when an inc
I've implemented a .include directive for the new assembler. It
basically changes the preprocessor to shift through the source file, and
when an include is found, the included file is unshifted to the
beginning.
Should I commit it?
Brian
--- assemble.pl 17 Jun 2002 03:18:17 - 1.74
++
11 matches
Mail list logo
