"Nick Glencross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/10/06, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would really like some feedback from MinGW and cygwin folks on how
> dynoplibs build and work for them
Works straight off on cygwin. :-) Gives the answers you wanted.
That's great, thank
On 1/10/06, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Note that dynamic op libs do not *work* on Win32 yet
> They do now - I'm using them with my .NET to PIR translator and they work
> nicely.
>
> I would really like some feedback from M
"Jonathan Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Note that dynamic op libs do not *work* on Win32 yet
They do now - I'm using them with my .NET to PIR translator and they work
nicely.
I would really like some feedback from MinGW and cygwin folks on how
dynoplibs build and work for them, as I
Hi,
I have just checked in some changes that makes the dynamic op libraries
build process work very much like the dynamic PMCs one. This has two good
consequences:
* Dynamic op libraries can (hopefully) now be built anywhere dynamic PMCs
can. Including Win32. Yay.
* More importantly, thi
