On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:38:25PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> Here are my assumptions:
>
> * anyone building Parrot now can install dependencies (working C compilation
> environment, potentially a bignum library, some CPAN modules, potentially
> flex/bison or equivalents)
Personally, I'm fine wi
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, chromatic wrote:
> On Monday 17 November 2008 11:07:52 Andrew Dougherty wrote:
>
> > Note, by the way, that perl-5.8.8 only shipped with Storable 2.15.
>
> Perl 5.8.8 doesn't ship with File::Which either, and we require that too.
> (We
> do bundle that in our repository,
On Monday 17 November 2008 11:07:52 Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> Note, by the way, that perl-5.8.8 only shipped with Storable 2.15.
Perl 5.8.8 doesn't ship with File::Which either, and we require that too. (We
do bundle that in our repository, which is something we shouldn't do and
something I th
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Andrew Dougherty wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, chromatic via RT wrote:
>
> > Storable 2.18 required in r32744, which should resolve this issue.
Note, by the way, that perl-5.8.8 only shipped with Storable 2.15.
--
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Reini Urban via RT wrote:
> 2008/11/17 Andrew Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, chromatic via RT wrote:
> >
> >> Storable 2.18 required in r32744, which should resolve this issue.
> >
> > But the ultimate problem was that the issue was an unnecessary hurd
2008/11/17 Andrew Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, chromatic via RT wrote:
>
>> Storable 2.18 required in r32744, which should resolve this issue.
>
> But the ultimate problem was that the issue was an unnecessary hurdle.
> At the time of the bug report, I tried building with S
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, chromatic via RT wrote:
> Storable 2.18 required in r32744, which should resolve this issue.
But the ultimate problem was that the issue was an unnecessary hurdle.
At the time of the bug report, I tried building with Storable-2.12 and
with 2.18 and observed *no difference*
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> I infer from the quoted message above that bumping the dependency to 2.13
> would work as well, but wouldn't cause a lot of other people who have 2.13
> to 2.17 installed to need to upgrade.
That's, in fact, what parrot currently requires: 2.13. Howe
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, chromatic via RT wrote:
> On Mon Oct 06 12:15:49 2008, doughera wrote:
>
> > Trying to compile today's parrot on an up-to-date version
> > of OpenSolaris:
> >
> > SunOS xxx 5.11 snv_98 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
> >
> > it failed (after a while) with the following error:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:30:33PM -0700, chromatic via RT wrote:
> On Mon Oct 06 12:15:49 2008, doughera wrote:
>
> > Trying to compile today's parrot on an up-to-date version
> > of OpenSolaris:
> >
> > SunOS xxx 5.11 snv_98 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
> >
> > it failed (after a while) with t
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #59660]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59660 >
Trying to compile today's parrot on an up-to-date version
of OpenSolaris:
SunOS x
11 matches
Mail list logo
