On Tue Oct 28 20:03:36 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This has continued to pass for me on 10.4/PPC. Coke, if it's passing
> for you as well (which, from Smolder reports, appears to be the case),
> then can you close the ticket?
>
No feedback from Coke, so I'm closing the ticket.
On Wed Oct 22 19:03:27 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After yesterday's release, this passed for me on Darwin PPC 10.4 at
> r32119. I'll keep my fingers crossed and keep watching the Smolder
reports.
>
This has continued to pass for me on 10.4/PPC. Coke, if it's passing
for you as well (which
After yesterday's release, this passed for me on Darwin PPC 10.4 at
r32119. I'll keep my fingers crossed and keep watching the Smolder reports.
kid51
James Keenan via RT wrote:
On Sat Oct 18 16:28:22 2008, coke wrote:
I'm submitting some every night at midnight on my osx/x86 box; if it's
obviously a temp directory and the right time frame, it's probably me.
Coke, can you confirm that the test is failing for you now? And, what
version of M
>
> I don't know who is submitting the Darwin x86 tests.
>
Probably Seneca.
--
Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com
On Sat Oct 18 16:28:22 2008, coke wrote:
>
> I'm submitting some every night at midnight on my osx/x86 box; if it's
> obviously a temp directory and the right time frame, it's probably me.
>
>
So it seems to be failing consistently on Darwin regardless of platform.
Also, tonight I confirmed t
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:24 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat Oct 18 12:01:13 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> James Keenan via RT wrote:
>> > Still failing on Darwin/PPC as of r32014:
>> >
>> > http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/6320/163
>>
>> L
On Sat Oct 18 12:01:13 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> James Keenan via RT wrote:
> > Still failing on Darwin/PPC as of r32014:
> >
> > http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/6320/163
>
> Looking at the specific test in question, this may be an integer size
> problem.
>
>
James Keenan via RT wrote:
Still failing on Darwin/PPC as of r32014:
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/6320/163
Looking at the specific test in question, this may be an integer size
problem.
And I should note that it's also been failing on Darwin/i386:
http://smo
Still failing on Darwin/PPC as of r32014:
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/6320/163
And I should note that it's also been failing on Darwin/i386:
http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/6316/163
Still failing as of r31872.
This was passing on Darwin as of r31667, i.e., just before the merge.
See http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/tap_stream/5891/163
FWIW, this test passed for me on Linux at the same SVN revision. And it
has always passed for me on Darwin previously, most recently at r31503
on 20080929.
13 matches
Mail list logo
