On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:17:33PM -0700, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Let's borrow the syntax from the makefile generation itself, and just
>>> have RM_F's definition be:
>>>
>>> +rm_f => '@
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:17:33PM -0700, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
Let's borrow the syntax from the makefile generation itself, and
just have RM_F's definition be:
+rm_f => '@perl@ -MExtUtils::Command -e rm_f',
[...]
Sound good to me.
Additionally (though it won't he
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:17:33PM -0700, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
> Let's borrow the syntax from the makefile generation itself, and
> just have RM_F's definition be:
>
> +rm_f => '@perl@ -MExtUtils::Command -e rm_f',
>
> [...]
>
> Additionally (though it won't help the original
On Sat Apr 12 07:57:11 2008, particle wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:15 PM, via RT Bernhard Schmalhofer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
> > # Please include the string: [perl #52776]
> > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about
