On Sat Apr 05 21:33:49 2008, infinoid wrote:
> On Fri Mar 21 09:03:08 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > there is a definition on my system for PARROT_HAS_SNPRINTF, but not a
> > definition for PARROT_HAS_C99_SNPRINTF. I assume, on first glance that
> > these two macros are one in the same and shou
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Mark Glines via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the clarification. How do you think we should fix it?
The patch I submitted for this ticket earlier addresses the multiple
redefinitions issue without doing anything funny with the
PARROT_HAS_SNPRINTF
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 17:50:27 -0700
"Andrew Whitworth via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just warnings about redefining the snprintf macro. It was defined in
> two different places, and it's definition was based on both of those
> two flags above. I was looking for a way to unify the definitions f
On Fri Mar 21 09:03:08 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> there is a definition on my system for PARROT_HAS_SNPRINTF, but not a
> definition for PARROT_HAS_C99_SNPRINTF. I assume, on first glance that
> these two macros are one in the same and should be united.
They are not. Please see the code in
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:03:08 -0700
"Andrew Whitworth" (via RT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by "Andrew Whitworth"
> # Please include the string: [perl #51980]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.h
# New Ticket Created by "Andrew Whitworth"
# Please include the string: [perl #51980]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51980 >
the snprintf macro was defined in Parrot/misc.h and src/spf_render.c.
I moved both
