On Tue Mar 18 12:27:52 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I committed my previous patch (after some merging) as r26480. But I
> think this ticket should stay open, as there are still more codingstd
> tests to convert, and I haven't even looked at t/distro yet.
>
Gladly offering ownership of this
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:01:39 -0700
Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm going to hold off until after Tuesday's release, in any case, just
> to make sure I don't break anything else.
I committed my previous patch (after some merging) as r26480. But I
think this ticket should stay open, a
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:19:48 -0700
"James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark:
>
> This looks good to me. However, one of the tests being revised is
> currently failing, probably for different reasons. See:
> http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51750.
Thanks for the cod
On Friday 14 March 2008 16:19:49 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> This looks good to me. However, one of the tests being revised is
> currently failing, probably for different reasons. See:
> http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51750. I recommend
> holding off applying it to trunk until a
Mark:
This looks good to me. However, one of the tests being revised is
currently failing, probably for different reasons. See:
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51750. I recommend
holding off applying it to trunk until after that bug is resolved --
which I suspect means holding of
# New Ticket Created by Mark Glines
# Please include the string: [perl #51718]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51718 >
There's a lot of common code in the tests in these directories, for
looping across a bunc
