On Sun Feb 24 21:54:31 2008, petergibbs wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Perl6 Internals"
>
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 4:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [perl #51136] [BUG]
- Original Message -
From: "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Perl6 Internals"
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 4:00 AM
Subject: Re: [perl #51136] [BUG] Segfault in Parrot_Ref_morph
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Peter Gibbs
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Peter Gibbs via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > As of r26037, tcl is once again generating a segfault (even on
> > feather!). The change in 26037 was to replace a morph + assig
"Will Coleda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> As of r26037, tcl is once again generating a segfault (even on
> feather!). The change in 26037 was to replace a morph + assign with
> the 'copy' opcode.
>
This is indeed a problem caused by the copy op.
Examining the
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda
# Please include the string: [perl #51136]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=51136 >
As of r26037, tcl is once again generating a segfault (even on
feather!). The change in 2
