On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Nicholas Clark via RT wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:49:33PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > 130 cast increases required alignment of target type
>
> That warning is unlikely to show up on anything x86 isn't it?
Right. Most of them them are also harmless, though i
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:49:33PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> 130 cast increases required alignment of target type
That warning is unlikely to show up on anything x86 isn't it?
> 65 dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
Whilst I believe I know a lot about C,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Paul Cochrane via RT wrote:
> Andy,
>
> > Here are the warnings I got on my latest run, along with the number of
> > times each one appeared: (this was with gcc-4.1.0 on Solaris/SPARC)
>
>
>
> This is very helpful for me to try and improve the situtation.
> Thanks! I'll
Andy,
> Here are the warnings I got on my latest run, along with the number of
> times each one appeared: (this was with gcc-4.1.0 on Solaris/SPARC)
This is very helpful for me to try and improve the situtation.
Thanks! I'll switch off the visibility attribute warning if possible
and then I c
On Monday 12 November 2007 16:49:18 chromatic wrote:
> > After poking around quite a bit, the following patch fixes it:
> >
> > --- parrot-current/src/ops/experimental.ops Wed Oct 17 19:15:15 2007
> > +++ parrot-andy/src/ops/experimental.opsMon Nov 12 15:13:43 2007
> > @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
> >
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Paul Cochrane wrote:
> The float_equals warnings in gcc *are* off. So why is this warning a
> problem (maybe I've missed something)?
They used to be on. I don't know when they were turned off. The
workaround in was put in place to try to silence the
warnings. When the
>> the definition of FLOAT_IS_ZERO in include/parrot/misc.h is
Could this be relevant to RT45209 (a -0.0 being taken as true, rather than
false?). I tried to track down the problem, but got lost in the woods.
Somebody more familiar with the logic might recognise it.
--
Email and shopping w
On 14/11/2007, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:20:40AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Nicholas Clark via RT wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0800, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > > > It may well be there's an issue with gcc
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 09:20:40AM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Nicholas Clark via RT wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0800, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > > It may well be there's an issue with gcc's optimizer, since the problem
> > > goes away without optimization,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Nicholas Clark via RT wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0800, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > It may well be there's an issue with gcc's optimizer, since the problem
> > goes away without optimization, but I think it's also fair to say that
> > the definition of FLOAT_
On 13/11/2007, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0800, Andy Dougherty wrote:
>
> > It may well be there's an issue with gcc's optimizer, since the problem
> > goes away without optimization, but I think it's also fair to say that
> > the definition of F
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0800, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> It may well be there's an issue with gcc's optimizer, since the problem
> goes away without optimization, but I think it's also fair to say that
> the definition of FLOAT_IS_ZERO in include/parrot/misc.h is
> perhaps not optimal he
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, chromatic via RT wrote:
> On Monday 12 November 2007 12:33:41 Andy Dougherty wrote:
> > It may well be there's an issue with gcc's optimizer, since the problem
> > goes away without optimization, but I think it's also fair to say that
> > the definition of FLOAT_IS_ZERO in in
On Monday 12 November 2007 12:33:41 Andy Dougherty wrote:
> I was trying parrot for the first time in a while today, and the test
> suite hung at t/op/arithmetics_22.pasm. (This is with gcc-4.1.0 on
> Solaris 8/SPARC.) It just sits and uses up CPU. It appears to be stuck
> in the 'gcd' op.
>
>
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #47397]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47397 >
I was trying parrot for the first time in a while today, and the test
suite hung at t
15 matches
Mail list logo
