Patches applied to trunk in r24898.
I will wait until after the release to apply the patch.
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> I was studying Jarkko's patch this morning in preparation for applying
> it. I had a number of concerns.
>
> 1. It turned out that at the point the patch was originally submitted,
> HEAD had moved a bit beyond the version against which Jarkko di
I was studying Jarkko's patch this morning in preparation for applying
it. I had a number of concerns.
1. It turned out that at the point the patch was originally submitted,
HEAD had moved a bit beyond the version against which Jarkko diffed. I
had refactored some of the patched code into inter
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> Patch posted by Jarkko Hietaniemi on parrot-porters. I'll be looking at
> this patch in conjunction with other fixes to this class and its tests.
His patch makes perfect sense to me. (But then his nearly always do.)
You can't know what passing
Patch posted by Jarkko Hietaniemi on parrot-porters. I'll be looking at
this patch in conjunction with other fixes to this class and its tests.
kid51
--- config/auto/warnings.pm.dist2008-01-08 05:51:42.0 +0200
+++ config/auto/warnings.pm 2008-01-08 06:01:23.0 +0200
@@
Failing test placed in TODO block in r22848 per suggestion from chromatic.
# New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
# Please include the string: [perl #47395]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=47395 >
On a fresh checkout today, the new test (new since last time I tried
parrot, anyway)
