Refactored module and associated test files committed to trunk in r22649.
chromatic wrote:
Are the extra pass() calls at the end to fix the Devel::Cover oddity?
Where a pass() explicitly mentions Devel::Cover, it is there either
because I experienced the D::C oddity with that file, or because that
file is structured much like others where I have experienced
On Monday 29 October 2007 19:54:11 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> The patch attached provides a refactoring of configuration step class
> auto::byteorder along the same lines as other recent refactorings of
> auto::* config classes, i.e., the code handling the C probe is
> refactored into one intern
The patch attached provides a refactoring of configuration step class
auto::byteorder along the same lines as other recent refactorings of
auto::* config classes, i.e., the code handling the C probe is
refactored into one internal subroutine, while everything that follows
is refactored into an inte
File holding framework for writing tests for this configuration step was
committed to trunk Oct 21 2007 in r22362. Tests do not yet provide high
coverage due to obstacles in testing runstep(). You are encouraged to
poke around and add tests.
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #43309]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=43309 >
Write unit tests for config/auto/byteorder.pm,
the module whose functionality executes
