On So. 09. Mär. 2008, 19:11:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, it looks like we've survived for a week without Test::Builder or
> any other Perl 5 core module in the Parrot distribution. (Thanks to
> Matt Kraai for helping out with t/perl/Parrot_Test.t.) So I think we
> can close this ticket.
>
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 9:10 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun Mar 16 05:00:30 2008, bernhard wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm reopening this ticket, as there are still external Perl 5 modules
> > in lib/Digest, lib/File, lib/IO, lib/Pod.
> >
> > The Perl::Critic policies in lib/
On Sun Mar 16 05:00:30 2008, bernhard wrote:
>
> I'm reopening this ticket, as there are still external Perl 5 modules
> in lib/Digest, lib/File, lib/IO, lib/Pod.
>
> The Perl::Critic policies in lib/Perl/Critic/Policy seem to be
> Parrot-specific.
Barney,
I understood the point of the ticket
Well, it looks like we've survived for a week without Test::Builder or
any other Perl 5 core module in the Parrot distribution. (Thanks to
Matt Kraai for helping out with t/perl/Parrot_Test.t.) So I think we
can close this ticket.
kid51
On Wed Feb 27 09:40:57 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Two possible solutions: Either eliminate those 6 tests entirely, or
> rewrite the tests to make the regexes which need to be matched tolerant
> of the differences between Test::Builder 0.60 and 0.72 in this regard.
>
Like chromatic, I a
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 09:40:58 James Keenan via RT wrote:
> On Wed Feb 27 05:59:58 2008, coke wrote:
> > I would recommend marking whatever version came with 5.8; If we
> > require a module that came with 5.10, we've effectively upped our base
> > perl requirement, and I don't think we're
On Wed Feb 27 09:57:55 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Are you depending on having Test::Harness 3?
Not at this point for the tests covered by 'make test'.
On Wed Feb 27 10:07:44 2008, pmichaud wrote:
>
> Since this is the first time in a while that META.yml
> has changed, I think we should attach this ticket or a new
> one to #51054 ("Parrot 0.6.0 release").
Dependency and comment added to that ticket.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 07:33:49PM -0800, James Keenan via RT wrote:
> 1. Should 'lib/Test' be removed from the:
> no_index:
> directory:
>
> element in META.yml. I felt it should, because that directory has
> ceased to be part of the Parrot distribution. So I patched META.yml in
> r260
# from James Keenan via RT
# on Wednesday 27 February 2008 09:40:
>The output of Test::Builder changed at 0.64_01, which falls in between
>the 0.60 we had in the distro and the 0.72 which most (but not all) of
>our developers are likely to be using now.
>...
>Two possible solutions: Either elimin
On Wed Feb 27 05:59:58 2008, coke wrote:
>
> I would recommend marking whatever version came with 5.8; If we
> require a module that came with 5.10, we've effectively upped our base
> perl requirement, and I don't think we're quite ready to jump to 5.10
> yet.
>
> Is the version that came with 5
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 10:33 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Feb 26 19:02:04 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Patch applied tonight in r26082.
>
> There's a bit of mop-up work needed as pointed out by chromatic on #parrot.
>
> 1. Should 'lib/Test' be removed from
On Tue Feb 26 19:02:04 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Patch applied tonight in r26082.
There's a bit of mop-up work needed as pointed out by chromatic on #parrot.
1. Should 'lib/Test' be removed from the:
no_index:
directory:
element in META.yml. I felt it should, because that direct
Patch applied tonight in r26082.
> >
> > Test::Builder was first released with perl 5.006002
> > Test::More was first released with perl 5.006002
> > Test::Simple was first released with perl 5.006002
AFAICT, the versions of these three modules found in lib/Test/ are all
0.60. Presumably, that version was included because it h
On Wed Feb 20 19:53:30 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed Feb 20 18:17:12 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Class::Struct was first released with perl 5.004
> ...
> > > Text::Balanced was first released with perl 5.007003
> > >
> >
>
Both removed from distribution in r25974.
On Wed Feb 20 18:17:12 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Class::Struct was first released with perl 5.004
...
> > Text::Balanced was first released with perl 5.007003
> >
>
These two packages will be removed in the next few days, as both are
core with Perl 5.8 and their deletion from the
On Wed Feb 20 17:33:28 2008, coke wrote:
>
> Another thing to consider is we've upped our minimum perl version
> since this ticket was
> opened. Here's a quick summary of modules we should be able to rip
> right out (based a naive
> search of all .pm files in the lib/ dir:)
>
> Class::Struct was
On Tue Jan 17 16:55:35 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> perl modules necessary for parrot configuration, development, and
> testing have been either committed to the parrot repo, assumed to be
> installed by the user, or (in some cases) checked for in code that
> uses them.
>
> this mish-mash is c
19 matches
Mail list logo
