Re: [perl #38216] [PATCH] fix parrot.pc.in

2006-01-12 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:11:13AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:51:58PM +, Nick Glencross wrote: > > > It looks like only prefix is actually set, and the other paths are set > > using pkgconfig variables (which look the same as the style that we've > > just move

Re: [perl #38216] [PATCH] fix parrot.pc.in

2006-01-12 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:51:58PM +, Nick Glencross wrote: > It looks like only prefix is actually set, and the other paths are set > using pkgconfig variables (which look the same as the style that we've > just moved away from). > > I hope that you don't mind, but I've not used your patc

Re: [perl #38216] [PATCH] fix parrot.pc.in

2006-01-12 Thread Nick Glencross
Greg Bacon (via RT) wrote: # New Ticket Created by Greg Bacon # Please include the string: [perl #38216] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38216 > There appears to have been some slop in the ${foo} -> @foo@

[perl #38216] [PATCH] fix parrot.pc.in

2006-01-12 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Greg Bacon # Please include the string: [perl #38216] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=38216 > There appears to have been some slop in the ${foo} -> @foo@ change, and the attached patc