Re: [perl #36059] [PATCH]Substitute Instructions Patch

2005-06-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Curtis Rawls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apparently my changes to optimizer.c uncovered a bug in subst_ins(). Yep. I've added a change there yesterday but it didn't help for all. Dunno yet why. So this variant is now in. rev 8235 leo

[perl #36059] [PATCH]Substitute Instructions Patch

2005-06-01 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Curtis Rawls # Please include the string: [perl #36059] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=36059 > Apparently my changes to optimizer.c uncovered a bug in subst_ins(). When an instructi