[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leopold Toetsch via RT írta:
>>Strange anyway. Folks reported that MinGW builds Parrot 0.1.2 ok.
> What can I say? Not for me. Not for me. Maybe they did not report their
> extra efforts to make it work?
Yeah, seems so. Can MinGW users please come u
Leopold Toetsch via RT Ãrta:
Anteusz @ Freemail . Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I found two bugs while trying to compile 0.1.2
Parrot is developing rapidly, please use always the CVS version for
submitting bugs and patches.
But as this one ...
I added o => '.o'.
... is still
Anteusz @ Freemail . Hu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found two bugs while trying to compile 0.1.2
Parrot is developing rapidly, please use always the CVS version for
submitting bugs and patches.
But as this one ...
> I added o => '.o'.
... is still the same - no problem here.
Strange an
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #34416]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34416 >
Hi!
I found two bugs while trying to compile 0.1.2
I solved the first one.
I ha
