> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> At 10:33 PM 9/13/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
DS> Actually, I'm expecting almost nothing to be written in pasm after
DS> we get a working parser and compiler. We mi
At 10:33 PM 9/13/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DS> Actually, I'm expecting almost nothing to be written in pasm after
> DS> we get a working parser and compiler. We might write template code
> DS> for the compiler in it, but that'
At 09:36 AM 9/14/2001 +0100, Leon Brocard wrote:
>Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether:
>
> > Actually, I'm expecting almost nothing to be written in pasm after we
> get a
> > working parser and compiler
>
>I am, as you may have noticed already, clearly a frustrated assembler
>p
Dan Sugalski sent the following bits through the ether:
> Actually, I'm expecting almost nothing to be written in pasm after we get a
> working parser and compiler
I am, as you may have noticed already, clearly a frustrated assembler
programmer who's had to code high-level stuff for far too lon
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> Actually, I'm expecting almost nothing to be written in pasm after
DS> we get a working parser and compiler. We might write template code
DS> for the compiler in it, but that's probably about it. Well, other
DS> than the JAPHs tha
At 09:42 AM 9/13/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>Dan --
>
> > > * The recognition of register types means that you can't use labels
> > > like 'I4'. It would be nice if registers and labels were in
> > > different namespaces.
> >
> > I don't think this is necessary. Odds are almost n
On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:18:38PM -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> Attached is a diff for assemble.pl that does a somewhat messy job of
> solving the problem posed in the TODO file. It does it by parsing
> the root of each opcode when parsing the opcode table and creating a
> hash with the opcode
At 05:36 PM 9/12/2001 -0400, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
>All --
>
>BTW, Here are some things to consider:
>
> * The recognition of register types means that you can't use labels
> like 'I4'. It would be nice if registers and labels were in
> different namespaces.
I don't think this is neces
All --
Attached is a diff for assemble.pl that does a somewhat messy job of
solving the problem posed in the TODO file. It does it by parsing
the root of each opcode when parsing the opcode table and creating a
hash with the opcode root and the formal argument types (qualifiers)
so that, e.g. $op
