From: Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:47:55 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Allison Randal via RT wrote:
> Agreed. I hate yielding compatibility, but it makes sense in this case
> (since we're likely to eventually require that any Perl 5 code in the
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Jerry Gay via RT wrote:
> 5.8.4 seems reasonable, given that nobody seems to care much about
> dropping 5.6 support. however, before applying this patch, we should
> consider a deprecation cycle, to warn folks that the next release
> version will require a newer version of per
On 4/27/07, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Allison Randal via RT wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
> >
> > My take: our long term goal is to eliminate the dependency we have on
> > perl. Let's not spend more time making it work with 5.6, but instead,
> > devote that tim
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Allison Randal via RT wrote:
> Will Coleda wrote:
> >
> > My take: our long term goal is to eliminate the dependency we have on
> > perl. Let's not spend more time making it work with 5.6, but instead,
> > devote that time to furthering the the long term goal. I vote we jus
