jerry gay wrote:
i'd prefer 'count_eh', to match every other exception handler related
op that has an '_eh' suffix. seems silly to have just one with a 'eh_'
prefix.
'count_eh' isn't distinctive enough.
Another possibility is not to provide an opcode for the number of
exception handlers, sin
On 10/24/07, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin Tew wrote:
> > exceptions_ops.diff adds some simple ops needed for PDD compliance.
> > exceptions.diff attempts to change all instances of clear_eh to pop_eh.
>
> Looks good.
>
> The exception handler stack introspection interface you a
Kevin Tew wrote:
exceptions_ops.diff adds some simple ops needed for PDD compliance.
exceptions.diff attempts to change all instances of clear_eh to pop_eh.
Looks good.
The exception handler stack introspection interface you added to the PDD
is solid. The stack will be replaced by the concurr
The included patch requires a new file t/op/exceptions.t, which tests basic exception
handling, in this case divide-by-zero.
Patch was generated against latest CVS, but it shouldn't matter -that- much.
-Jeff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --recursive -C 2 parrot_cvs/MANIFEST parrot/MANIFEST
*** pa
