Re: [PATCH: P6C] update calling convention

2004-05-10 Thread Allison Randal
Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Might not be out of line to start a notes file or something to throw > in observations and whatnot that you and other folks come across as > you work on this stuff. I just added languages/perl6/doc/developer_notes.pod, with a few current notes. Add to it as relevant. Alli

Re: [PATCH: P6C] update calling convention

2004-05-10 Thread Steve Fink
On May-09, Allison Randal wrote: > > BTW, should I keep working on P6C? As A12 has just come out P6C may be > > heavily under construction, and I don't want to be in the way... > > Please do. I'm working on a first rough implementation of classes, but > it shouldn't interfere with general patches.

Re: [PATCH: P6C] update calling convention

2004-05-09 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If syntax like this: > find_lex $P2, "&die" > $P2($P0) > isn't possible yet, it probably should be. Works since some weeks. > Allison leo

Re: [PATCH: P6C] update calling convention

2004-05-09 Thread Allison Randal
Abhijit A. Mahabal wrote: > this is my first patch ever (not just p6i: ever). So do tell me > what I have done wrong. Sorry not to respond before the patch was applied. Crazy week. > This is a patch for one of the ToDo items in languages/perl6/Todo. I have > updated the calling conventions

Re: [PATCH: P6C] update calling convention

2004-05-08 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 3:20 PM -0500 5/5/04, Abhijit A. Mahabal wrote: This is a patch for one of the ToDo items in languages/perl6/Todo. I have updated the calling conventions in a bunch of places, but may have missed some. Applied, thanks. BTW, should I keep working on P6C? As A12 has just come out P6C may be heavi

[PATCH: P6C] update calling convention

2004-05-05 Thread Abhijit A. Mahabal
Hi, this is my first patch ever (not just p6i: ever). So do tell me what I have done wrong. This is a patch for one of the ToDo items in languages/perl6/Todo. I have updated the calling conventions in a bunch of places, but may have missed some. One more subtest is failing because of my c