Re: [CVS ci] JIT bug fix

2002-11-13 Thread Steve Fink
On Nov-13, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Daniel Grunblatt wrote: > > > On Wednesday 13 November 2002 08:06, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > > > >>I could localize a long outstanding bug in JIT causing 4 perl6 tests to > >>fail. > > > I wonder who was the #%$# that introduced that bug . D'OH! :) > > Wow,

Re: [CVS ci] JIT bug fix

2002-11-13 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 11:48, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Daniel Grunblatt wrote: > > On Wednesday 13 November 2002 08:06, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > >>I could localize a long outstanding bug in JIT causing 4 perl6 tests to > >>fail. > > > > I wonder who was the #%$# that introduced that bug

Re: [CVS ci] JIT bug fix

2002-11-13 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Daniel Grunblatt wrote: > On Wednesday 13 November 2002 08:06, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > >>I could localize a long outstanding bug in JIT causing 4 perl6 tests to >>fail. > I wonder who was the #%$# that introduced that bug . D'OH! :) Wow, Daniel, the lost son himself ;-) So I immediately ha

Re: [CVS ci] JIT bug fix

2002-11-13 Thread Daniel Grunblatt
On Wednesday 13 November 2002 08:06, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > I could localize a long outstanding bug in JIT causing 4 perl6 tests to > fail. > When an opcode was a branch target as well as a branch source, the > branch target got lost, causing wrong basic blocks, implying missing > register loads

[CVS ci] JIT bug fix

2002-11-13 Thread Leopold Toetsch
I could localize a long outstanding bug in JIT causing 4 perl6 tests to fail. When an opcode was a branch target as well as a branch source, the branch target got lost, causing wrong basic blocks, implying missing register loads ... All perl6 tests are now ok on JIT too. leo