# New Ticket Created by v-lk
# Please include the string: [perl #69524]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=69524 >
Hello!
I've installed rakudo on my PC with Ubuntu AMD64.
Everything was OK, BUT later I began
On Tue Sep 22 10:39:17 2009, fperrad wrote:
> >
>
> FYI, some existing tools (but not Perl)
> - FIT : http://fit.c2.com/
> - FitNesse & Slim : http://fitnesse.org/
>
François,
Thanks for the reference. If someone wants to examine these links and
open a TT, they are welcome to do so.
In the mea
On Mon Sep 21 15:28:01 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
>
> So, unless there is some strong objection, I will close this ticket
> within 7 days.
>
No one spoke up for this; rejecting ticket.
This ticket has been open for more than two-and-a-half years -- solely
on the basis of an ancient inline comment. In that time no one has
produced any evidence that we are doing the wrong thing. Given how many
of our developers are currently working on AMD64, I would have expected
that by now som
On Wed Sep 16 05:49:12 2009, cognominal wrote:
> the report is not relevant anymore. you can close the ticket. Thx
>
Closing.
On Wed Feb 25 16:08:29 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
> On Thu Jan 29 06:15:28 2009, Whiteknight wrote:
> >
> > has the remove_pic branch landed yet?
>
>
> Well, it's still an active branch in SVN. So I would guess not.
Per discussion on the mailing list, we're removing the remove_pic branch
On Tue May 12 05:18:47 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
> Here's an update based on a recent Smolder report
>
Thanks to a steady stream of Smolder reports from 'sm...@pc42.my.domain'
-- I don't know who the human there is -- performed on OpenBSD/amd64, we
can see that we are passing all non-SKIPped
On Sun Jul 19 18:27:29 2009, tene wrote:
> Parrot still doesn't have a hierarchy of exception types.
> exception;death doesn't exist. This is the same as rt#36261. I
> recommend that both of these tickets be merged into a single TT.
At Tene's suggestion, I am consolidating this ticket with one
On Sun Jul 19 18:22:00 2009, tene wrote:
> This still hasn't been done. I've been thinking about this again
> recently, and I'll try to move it higher in my TODO list. I have a lot
> of exceptions cleanups that I still need to document and/or do.
At Tene's suggestion, I am consolidating this ti
On Mon Dec 01 11:39:33 2008, pmichaud wrote:
>
> ... how exactly does one use C, C,
> and the other exception types from PIR? I see them mentioned throughout
> pdd23, but I've never actually seen an example of how these constants
> (are they constants?) might appear in actual code, whether it's P
Although I cannot be sure that the issues which were cited in the
original post to this RT have been cleared up, I note that there has
been no follow-up discussion in eight months.
So I'm going to resolve this ticket and encourage any new LANG-related
failures to be reported in new tickets in our
This ticket has been moved into the Trac system at
https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/857.
Please continue the discussion there. Thank you very much.
kid51
There's been a lot of water under the bridge since this test failure
report was originally filed. So we would undoubtedly need new reports
to go forward.
I'm going to close this ticket and encourage people with access to
NexentaOS (GNU/OpenSolaris) to configure and build Parrot from HEAD and
to f
This ticket addressed a variety of issues why may or may not still be
apropos. However, I suspect that the specific approach to
install-related problems suggested in the ticket will be superseded by
the work done on such issues in the last month.
Would it be possible to review this ticket and rec
This ticket has been moved into the Trac system:
https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/854. Please continue the
discussion there.
Thank you very much.
kid51
I have moved this ticket to the Trac system:
https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/850. Please continue discussion
there.
Thank you very much.
kid51
The discussion in this ticket appears to have petered out in June 2006.
The state of any efforts to work on it is unclear.
This RT was mentioned by Whiteknight on his blog on July 17 2009:
"Likewise, Ticket #38146 discusses the creation of a file copying
utility, although discussion there has s
No objections heard. Resolving ticket.
On Sat May 09 19:40:51 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
>
> In the course of working on RT 43683, I came across the inline comment
> which was the pretext for creating this ticket in the first place. It
> was not removed when the ticket was rejected. And since I was doing
> some refactoring for t
Rejected, and ticket resolved, in r38997.
kid51
Rejected, and ticket resolved, in r38996.
kid51
On Sun Mar 22 06:09:15 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
> On Mon Mar 19 15:43:27 2007, particle wrote:
> > there's a number of scripts and utilities in the tools/ subtree which
> > i suspect have gone unused for some time now. this ticket is a
> > placeholder to track efforts on surveying and fixing
Here's an update based on a recent Smolder report
(http://smolder.plusthree.com/app/public_projects/report_details/21469);
veracity.t: passing
arithmetics.t:
ok 7 - negate -0.0 # TODO -0.0 not implemented, TT #313 : still not passing
(Why is this showing up yellow rather than green on the Smolde
I've been staring at this ticket for more than a year. One of my
earlier patches got us part of the way there. Applying Reini's or
something like that would get us closer.
But the more I look at this problem in light of
https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/586,
https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ti
See also discussion in https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/ticket/658.
On Tue Jul 10 05:04:48 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In lib/Parrot/Docs/Group.pm there is the todo item:
>
> # TODO - Groups should only contain items or paths.
>
> This restriction needs to be implemented.
Why? Can anyone say?
I doubt it, if only because I doubt that anyone understands the
Parrot
On Tue Jul 10 05:13:07 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In the file lib/Parrot/Docs/Item.pm there is the todo item:
>
> # TODO - Items should only contain paths
>
> This restriction needs to be implemented.
Why? Can anyone say?
I doubt it, if only because I doubt that anyone understands the
Parrot::D
On Fri Apr 17 13:29:57 2009, cotto wrote:
> On Fri Apr 17 13:24:13 2009, julianalbo wrote:
> > > I propose rejecting this ticket as unnecessary. The code may not be
> > > optimal, but it works fine and isn't even particularly hacky or
broken.
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
>
> rejected!
In the course of
On Fri Apr 17 13:27:36 2009, cotto wrote:
>
> make html works fine, as far as I can tell. Is there any reason why
> this ticket can't be rejected?
No. Deleted those two comments in r38663. Marking ticket rejected.
kid51
In r38498, applied patch supplied by Michael Peters. See also:
https://trac.parrot.org/parrot/wiki/SmolderTaskList.
On Sun Mar 18 08:23:45 2007, codermattie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the course of testing the parrot-0.4.9 release I discovered a
> number of files installed by the "reallyinstall" target that
> don't belong in an install image.
>
> To understand the output Configure.pl was called with:
> --prefix=
On Fri May 01 13:16:13 2009, coke wrote:
>
> What I meant was, I'll apply this in a few days (sometime this weekend)
> UNLESS I hear back from other darwin developers with complaints.
I tried the suggested deletion. It caused no problems for me on
Darwin/PPC. So +1 on the change.
kid51
The 'reallyinstall' target is gone, so we can resolve this ticket.
On Tue Apr 21 05:36:53 2009, bacek wrote:
> On Sun Aug 24 08:06:29 2008, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
>
> There is no more tools/dev/ops_renum.mak. Can we close this ticket?
>
The only reason I did not previously close it was Coke's expression of a
desire to pull this into the main Makefile. But I
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #63632]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63632 >
Ah, excellent! Um, maybe not quite yet? I just created:
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket
# New Ticket Created by Allison Randal
# Please include the string: [perl #63630]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63630 >
testing
# New Ticket Created by Ask Bjoern Hansen
# Please include the string: [perl #63626]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63626 >
On Mar 3, 2009, at 13:36, Allison Randal wrote:
Looks like Robert just did it. :-
# New Ticket Created by Andy Wardley
# Please include the string: [perl #63394]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63394 >
This patch:
1) Updates the docs/pct/gettingstarted.pod documentation to reflect that
# New Ticket Created by Saleem A. Ansari
# Please include the string: [perl #63036]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=63036 >
Fixed typos in docs/book
ch09_pct.pod |2 +-
ch11_pmcs.pod|2 +-
c
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #62994]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62994 >
after "svn up" to #362306
src\pmc\parrotlibrary.c
mingw32-make: *** No rule to make targ
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #62972]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62972 >
I thought these problems had been fixed. If my memory is at fault, I'll
shut up and go b
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #62974]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62974 >
(At #36249). I thought these problems had been fixed. If my memory is at
fault, I'll shu
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #62920]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62920 >
After running svn up to 36161, and a make realclean, on Mandriva, the
gen::makefiles ste
# New Ticket Created by Ron Schmidt
# Please include the string: [perl #62634]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62634 >
The documentation on line 51 of src/ops/pmc.ops still refers to PDD02
which has been sup
# New Ticket Created by Ron Schmidt
# Please include the string: [perl #62588]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62588 >
The line in the test script read: # 'inspect'() # XXX must fix
'attributes' test
On
On Tue Oct 02 11:01:32 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In src/objects.c:Parrot_ComposeRole() there is the todo item:
>
> * XXX TODO: multi-method handling. */
>
> I think this means that multi-method handling neds to be handled at this
> point in the code.
>
Indeed. Done this in r35820.
Thanks,
Jonathan
# New Ticket Created by I Sop
# Please include the string: [perl #62506]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62506 >
Following perl6 code segfaults with r31857:
say 8.bla;
# New Ticket Created by I Sop
# Please include the string: [perl #62504]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62504 >
Following perl6 code segfaults:
multi foo($x where { $x == 5 }) { say 'yum' }
foo 8;
# New Ticket Created by I Sop
# Please include the string: [perl #62432]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62432 >
With r35615.
Following script to perl6 segfaults:
sub yum() { }
sub callit(&x) { x; }
callit y
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #62204]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62204 >
(On Windows XP Home) after mingw32-make realclean and Configure.pl
STDERR output attache
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #62206]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62206 >
Under Windows (XP Home) Strawberry Perl
Attached are STDERR output and the summary of S
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #62202]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62202 >
Running Configure.pl under Windows (XP Home), Strawberry Perl, produces
the following err
# New Ticket Created by Donald Hunter
# Please include the string: [perl #62010]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=62010 >
This patch fixes a problem with gcc 3.4.6 on Linux where -fvisibility=hidden
is detecte
# New Ticket Created by Saleem A. Ansari
# Please include the string: [perl #61874]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61874 >
Fixed typos in docs/book
ch08_architecture.pod | 11 +--
ch09_pct.pod
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #61870]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61870 >
I know that committers are not supposed to be opening new tickets in
RT, but I am forc
# New Ticket Created by Markus Mayr
# Please include the string: [perl #61858]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61858 >
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.6.26-1-686
arch= i486-linux-gnu-thread-multi
cc= cc
---
On Sat Dec 27 20:56:38 2008, rgrjr wrote:
>
> When updating an old working copy, I just happened to notice that
> "parrot-config" was deleted since June. So was able to find this:
>
> r28977 | chromatic | 2008-07-02 21:42:27 -0400 (Wed, 02 Jul 2008)
> | 2 lines
>
> [parrot-config] Turne
# New Ticket Created by Saleem A. Ansari
# Please include the string: [perl #61812]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61812 >
Removed Duplicate example code for creating "Foo" class in
docs/book/ch05_pasm.pod
F
# New Ticket Created by Ovid
# Please include the string: [perl #61786]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61786 >
Numerous examples of "it's" which should be "its" and various other corrections
for 10_hlls.pod
# New Ticket Created by Markus Laker
# Please include the string: [perl #61744]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61744 >
Hello,
I'm attempting to compile Parrot and Perl 6 for the first time using gcc 4.1.2
# New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
# Please include the string: [perl #61738]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61738 >
On Windows XP Home with Strawberry Perl, (after doing mingw32-make realclean)
Failures e
# New Ticket Created by Saleem A. Ansari
# Please include the string: [perl #61638]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61638 >
Fixed typos in docs.
book/ch01_overview.pod | 10 +-
book/ch03_pir_bas
# New Ticket Created by Stephane Payrard
# Please include the string: [perl #61394]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61394 >
my $s = " "; say $s.chars # now returns 1
Note : the bug was reported on macinte
# New Ticket Created by François PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #61316]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61316 >
The following code works well
$ cat digest.pir
.sub 'main'
$P0 = loadlib
# New Ticket Created by François PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #61290]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61290 >
Since the merge of the branch ppd22io, the mode of the stdin stream has changed.
Curr
# New Ticket Created by François PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #61286]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61286 >
The new opcode 'box' is limited by its 3 signatures that target Float,
Integer & Stri
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #61282]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61282 >
Parrot r33793 has has two failures in 'make fulltest', in the last bunch
of the test runs
# New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
# Please include the string: [perl #61242]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61242 >
After a 'make realclean' I ran 'perl Configure --optimize && make'. It
dies like this:
.
# New Ticket Created by Jonathan Worthington
# Please include the string: [perl #61224]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61224 >
Hi,
It seems that the .eof() method on file handles can sometimes return
true
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #61208]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61208 >
Hello,
with Fedora 10 the place for building RPMs change from /usr/src/redhat
to t
# New Ticket Created by Ben Marsh
# Please include the string: [perl #61154]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61154 >
The test in t/src/compiler.t is being skipped with comment 'compreg
disabled/imcc_compile_p
# New Ticket Created by Ilya Belikin
# Please include the string: [perl #61092]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61092 >
Hi!
---
osname= linux
osvers= 2.6.22-3-amd64
arch= x86_64-linux-gnu-thread-multi
cc=
Ovid:
I'm going to merge this RT into the one we already have open reporting
the same failure on Darwin/PPC. I believe the problem occurred in
r33324. I think chromatic is looking into this.
Thank you for your report.
kid51
# New Ticket Created by Simon Cozens
# Please include the string: [perl #61060]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61060 >
This is a bit of a fragile one as it moves around depending on what NCI
functions I have
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #61052]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61052 >
This bug has been around for a while, but I've been too lazy to report it :)
My bu
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #61044]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61044 >
Full output from "perl t/harness -v t/compilers/imcc/syn/macro.t" attached.
Summa
# New Ticket Created by Jarkko Hietaniemi
# Please include the string: [perl #61038]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=61038 >
---
osname= dec_osf
osvers= 5.1b
arch= alpha-dec_osf-thread-multi
cc= cc
---
# New Ticket Created by GW
# Please include the string: [perl #60986]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60986 >
Hi,
I think it is wrong that the Win32 installation package for Parrot
refuses to install if not
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
# Please include the string: [perl #60940]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60940 >
On win32, XP, the test t/dynpmc/foo.t fails, wiht the output:
t/dynpmc/dynlexpad..
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #60926]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60926 >
This test has recently begun to fail on Darwin/PPC. (It continues to
pass for me on L
On Wed Nov 26 13:18:57 2008, coke wrote:
>
>
> The only remaining instance in branch that I'm not sure how to resolve
> is
>
> t/configure/034-step.t
>
> Jim - if you could take a look at that usage of miniparrot and either
> bless it or remove it, that'd be very helpful. (I can't tell if i
Test continues to pass, so I'm resolving ticket.
On Thu Oct 25 08:20:10 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In t/perl/Parrot_Test.t there are the todo item comments:
>
> # TODO test write_code_to_file(), plan(), skip(), slurp_file()
>
> # test the test functions from Parrot::Test
> # TODO: test the untested test functions
>
> This is all (realistically speak
On Thu Oct 25 08:18:13 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In t/perl/Parrot_Test.t there is the todo item:
>
> # TODO test run_command()
>
> Do this please :-)
Since RT 46893 calls for testing Parrot::Test in general, I'm going to
merge this ticket into that one.
kid51
Moritz confirmed that a related ticket is passing for him, so I'm
stealing this ticket and marking it Resolved.
kid51
On Mon Nov 24 13:45:03 2008, coke wrote:
>
> I'm satisfied that the original request is resolved. There's a lot of
> discussion further down in the ticket which I /think/ can be shelved
> until whenever config is looked at down the road.
>
Agreed. I will take the ticket now and close it in
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #60798]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60798 >
Here are the headers I get when I receive an email due to my
subscription to [EMAIL PR
Done in r33127. Other suggestions?
On Sun Nov 23 17:48:48 2008, particle wrote:
> >
> the use_ok tests can all go in one file, so they're only run once.
> ~jerry
Reviewing them, I think we can probably eliminate them as 'use_ok' tests
and simply 'use' the modules. I think I'll do that with all except the
config step classes, whic
Why is this test labelled [Perl] rather than [PIR]?
On Wed Oct 24 13:06:54 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In t/pmc/threads.t there is the todo item:
>
> # XXX FIXME rework tests since we don't really have thread types?
>
> I hope this comment is fairly self-explanatory.
Well, I, for one, don't know what it means.
Also, shouldn't this be classified as a [P
On Wed Oct 24 14:56:32 2007, pcoch wrote:
> In t/pmc/bignum.t there is the todo item:
>
> # XXX Capture STDOUT
> runtest( $_[0], $_[1], $ops{ $ARGV[2] }, $_[3], $round{ $_[4] }, $_[5] );
>
> Which means that the output from stdout needs to be captured (and
> supposedly used) when running individu
On Tue Jan 22 16:14:47 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue Jan 22 14:02:30 2008, ajr wrote:
>
> >
> > Any suggestions for further floundering would be welcome.
> >
>
> Well, here's one thought. You could try running Configure.pl with the
> addition of the --configure_trace option. Read th
On Wed Jun 18 07:43:59 2008, packy wrote:
> Minor note:
>
> Darwin Kernel Version 7.9.0 => OSX 10.3.9
I believe we recently made Storable v2.12 the minimum version for
configuration of Parrot. Have you tried configuring recently? Any
different results?
Thank you very much.
kid51
Is there someone on RedHat or Fedora who could take a whack at this?
Coke, notfound:
Did we reach any resolution on these questions?
Thank you very much.
kid51
On Wed Sep 10 19:48:04 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can someone evaluate where we stand with respect to the issues in this RT?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> kid51
Still hoping for feedback on these issues.
Jeff,
Have you tried out the patch, or otherwise tried to build Parrot recently?
Thank you very much.
kid51
We're in the beginning stages of deprecating smoke.parrotcode.org in
favor of our Smolder report system. So it would probably not be worth
our effort to modify the smoke system to accept smoke test reports from
new sources, such as proposed here for releases.
I would like to encourage you to try
This appears to be the same issue as reported in RT 59112, so I am going
to merge this ticket into that.
kid51
1 - 100 of 6876 matches
Mail list logo
