chromatic schreef:
On Monday 31 December 2007 05:50:47 Allison Randal wrote:
In the concurrency work I'm about to check in, I have some tests that
fail intermittently because they test for something like:
1
alarm1
2
alarm2
3
alarm3
alarm1
alarm3
4
alarm3
alarm3
alarm3
5
done.
When the actual
Matt Fowles wrote:
I am vaguely familiar with Topaz and a google search turns up a great
deal of out of date information.
Is there somewhere I can find a postmortem of what went wrong/why the
project was abandoned?
An article by Allison Randal, Dan Sugalski, & Leopold Tötsch
( http://www.developer
Joseph Ryan wrote:
macro prolog is parsed(m:w/
\: ([
<[^p]>+ ::
| p
]+)
prolog \. ;
/) {
eval($_, "prolog");
}
But, this is perl6-language stuff anyways. (:
Ah yes. Sorry. I try to read both whenever I have
some time. I did not che
Joseph Ryan wrote:
Can someone provide clarification on what mixing languages will
look like in practice, or point me to where its explained?
Warning. This is perl 7 and a half:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use prolog;
prolog: # prolog tells us:
needs_support_of(Db, Da):-
designer(A, Da),
des
Hm I should have run the test before I replied.
I removed the negatives.
Unfortunately the uppercased literals yield 0 instead of 42.
use Parrot::Test tests => 1;
output_is(<<'CODE', <<'OUTPUT', "integer literals");
print 0x2A
print "\n"
print 0X2A
print "\n"
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 3:10 PM -0700 8/16/04, Danny Werner (via RT) wrote:
Examples from the 2th aoudad book (page 127) did not
turn out as expected. Being completely new to this,
I did not know where to put the testcode.
And now the
Simon Wistow wrote:
Leopold Toetsch said:
Rather not. Python is AFAIK not as portable as Perl. But there is a Perl
based make somewhere, the named just escaped my mind.
It's called Cons. I can't remember whether Cons or Scons came first
(ah, Cons was the orginal http://www.scons.org/faq.html#SS_6
