On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 15:53, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 6:09 PM, kjstol wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Will Coleda via RT <
>> parrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue Jul 04 19:30:44 2006, autri...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> > IMCC currently relies on a l
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:23, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:12 PM, chromatic wrote:
>> On Thursday 05 February 2009 08:57:18 jerry gay wrote:
>>
>>> we will roll our own bignum, and give users the ability to use gmp or
>>> another external libr
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:44, Reini Urban via RT
wrote:
> On Thu Jan 29 06:05:13 2009, Whiteknight wrote:
>> On Wed Dec 24 05:39:54 2008, Whiteknight wrote:
>> > On Tue Dec 23 19:02:17 2008, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
>> > > On Sat Jun 14 17:15:32 2008, jk...@verizon.net wrote:
>> > > > Would it be
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 08:45, Andrew Whitworth via RT
wrote:
> On Thu Feb 05 08:40:47 2009, particle wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 08:26, Andrew Whitworth via RT
>> wrote:
>> > 1) Are we going to be relying on libraries to handle our BigInt/BigNum
>> > implementations, or are we intending to r
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 08:26, Andrew Whitworth via RT
wrote:
> 1) Are we going to be relying on libraries to handle our BigInt/BigNum
> implementations, or are we intending to roll our own?
we can't rely on external libraries, whether for bignum, unicode, gc,
or anything else. we can detect and u
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 13:07, Will Coleda wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 12:29 PM, via RT Alan Rocker
> wrote:
>> # New Ticket Created by Alan Rocker
>> # Please include the string: [perl #62974]
>> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
>> # http://rt.perl.org/rt
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 16:06, James Keenan via RT
wrote:
> The t/stm/*.t tests have gone away (when or whence I do not know), so I
> propose we close this ticket. Any objections?
>
the STM subsystem has been removed. close the ticket, and all other
STM-related tickets.
~jerry
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:58, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:24:46AM -0800, parti...@cvs.perl.org wrote:
>
>> -gen_sprintf_call(tc, &info, ch);
>> -ts = cstr2pstr(tc);
>> +/* check for Inf and
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 15:42, Mark Glines wrote:
> donald.hun...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I was pretty averse to adding an additional configure step myself. The
>> problem is that warnings.pm checks specifically for supported compiler flags
>> and I didn't want to include other things there. The bug
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 13:26, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon Sep 08 18:43:49 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Tue Aug 19 19:28:43 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > A net total of 5 t/configure/*.t files were eliminated tonight as part
>> > of r30368 (RT 57780).
>>
>>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 05:16, Andrew Whitworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 9:50 PM, via RT Jerry Gay
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # New Ticket Created by Jerry Gay
> > # Please include the string: [perl #60624]
> > # in the subje
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 23:39, via RT Matt Kraai <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Matt Kraai
> # Please include the string: [perl #60568]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60568 >
>
>
> On
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 23:37, via RT Matt Kraai <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Matt Kraai
> # Please include the string: [perl #60566]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60566 >
>
>
> Ho
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:49 AM, via RT Canol Gökel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Canol Gökel
> # Please include the string: [perl #60098]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=60098 >
>
>
>
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Patrick R. Michaud (via RT)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
> # Please include the string: [perl #60070]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 6:49 AM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Andrew Whitworth via RT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed Jul 30 11:57:39 2008, coke wrote:
>>> PDD19 lists this as deprecated now, changing from an [RFC
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Ovid
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would help if I sent this to the correct mailing list. Oops.
>
> Cheers,
> Ovid
>
> --- On Mon, 20/10/08, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I've been doing some work integrating Perl 6 into vim
>> and now I'm trying to figure
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Mark Grimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The attached patch now includes the pir/pasm_error_output* tests in
> pir. I have also added t/pmc/complex.t. Couple of issues:
>
> 1) I am not sure how to deal with pcc_sub's so I put them into
> t/pmc/objects-pcc_sub.t
> 2)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Andrew Whitworth via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat Jun 11 13:08:49 2005, chip wrote:
>> Short version: Up through version 0.8 or so, we promise to break
>> everything constantly (but not until we have a good reason). After
>> that, we will establish versi
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Andrew Whitworth via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Jul 30 11:57:39 2008, coke wrote:
>> PDD19 lists this as deprecated now, changing from an [RFC] to
>> [DEPRECATED], re-opening from stalled.
>
> The big hangup for this ticket is that various parts of PCT
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Allison Randal via RT wrote:
>
> > jerry gay wrote:
> > >
> > > .\src\pmc\float.c(3340) : warning C4204: nonstandard extension used
> > > : non-cons
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 01:48:17PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
>
>> In general, filesystems are case-insensitive, not platforms. I believe Mac
>> OS
>> X's Hateful File System Plus is one offender, though you can use UFS inst
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:00 PM, via RT Andy Dougherty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
> # Please include the string: [perl #59658]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59658 >
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Patrick R. Michaud (via RT)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Patrick R. Michaud
> # Please include the string: [perl #59374]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?i
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:31 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 September 2008 11:22:22 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Modified:
>>trunk/docs/book/ch04_pir_subroutines.pod
>>trunk/docs/book/ch09_hlls.pod
>>
>> Log:
>> [Book] Add some basic info about VTables and HLL n
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 09:06:44AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 0
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 07:34 -0500, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>> > "Aggregating coroutine" and "aggregating yield" aren't nearly as zippy
>> > as 'gather' and 'take', but they're more meaningful to a broader
>> > audien
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Sep 16 15:00:24 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Tuesday 16 September 2008 14:47:58 NotFound wrote:
>>
>> > > It certainly shouldn't segfault. But, the question is: why does it
>> > > segfault at 206 par
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:27 PM, via RT Moritz Lenz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Moritz Lenz
> # Please include the string: [perl #58934]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58934 >
>
>
>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 5:14 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Sep 16 00:08:29 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Monday 15 September 2008 20:06:11 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>> > See patch attached. The patch eliminates smartlink-related code from
>> > Parrot, but d
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:47 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to see if we can move this ticket toward resolution. I think
> that it has remained unresolved for so long because the original post
> originally called for two steps: (a) removal from Configure.pl of
> c
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a) Do abstract base classes as currently implemented in Parrot serve any
> useful purpose? If not, eliminate them.
>
can they be replaced by roles?
~jerry
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Will Coleda via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu Jun 26 11:01:00 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> chromatic wrote:
>>
>> > T::H 3 is only a requirement for people who want to type 'make
>> smolder' (and
>> > eventually I hope 'make smoke'), so probing for it w
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
>
>> On Wed May 10 11:01:34 2006, stmpeters wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm taking a look at it. I should have something working this evening
>> > for the configs. Adding the HAS_BLAH
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:59 AM, via RT Ronald Schmidt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Ronald Schmidt
> # Please include the string: [perl #58610]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58610 >
>
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:36 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This must make the following syntax rule illegal:
>>>
>>> target = null
>>>
>>> because if "null" is declared
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerry gay wrote:
>>>
>>> #+ and #- is lisp so I don't want to destroy #+ the syntax rules.
>>> #IF(): is quite short and easy to read.
>>>
>> i know it was all
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerry gay schrieb:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll go now for something like
>>>
>>> #IF(key1|
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll go now for something like
>
> #IF(key1|key2&(key3&!key4))
> #IFNOT(key1|key2&(key3&!key4))
>
> And probably a shortcut for the negative else clause, like
> #IF(cygwin):
> #ELSE:
>
> #+ and #- is lisp so I don't want to d
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 11:39 PM, James Keenan via RT
>> 4. Parrot::OpsRenumber::renum_op_map_file() has been revised so that it
>> will behave properly before Parrot 1.0 -- when deletion of opcodes is
>> still permitted --
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Running 'make test' now fills the main directory of the repository with junk
> files like:
>
> test_98093.out
> test_37653.c
> test_98093.ldo
> test_97159.c
>
> The offending tests need to be modified t
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Jesse Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [List-CC changed]
>
> On Aug 19, 2008, at 4:10 PM, Reini Urban wrote:
>
>> Bob Rogers schrieb:
>>>
>>> On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 0.7.0 "Severe
>>> Macaw." Parrot (http://parrotcode.org/) is
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:50 PM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Mich
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Will Coleda wrote:
>>
>>> The eventual goal of this cleanup is to get these tests running via
>>> smolder to give core developers more feedback on
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:07:46 -0700
>
> . . .
>
> It seems then that we have two remaining options:
>
> 1. Don't run codingstd as part of smolder.
>
> 2. Differe
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 3:50 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat Aug 09 10:31:37 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Saturday 09 August 2008 06:33:46 James Keenan via RT wrote:
>>
>> > > What purpose remains, then, for either tools/dev/ops_renum.mak or
>> my
>> > > alternati
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Ron Blaschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Worthington wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just been looking at the time op, and what it returns is somewhat
>> platform specific.
>>
>> * On Win32, it's the number of seconds since January 1, 1601
>
> If I remember co
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Rakudo is currently failing t\spec\S12-class\attributes.t. This turns out
> not to be an issue with attributes, but rather exceptions. The test does:
>
> my $c = Counter.new();
> try {
> $c.x
> }
> ok($!, 'n
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Klaas-Jan Stol wrote:
>>
>> I think basically the question remans; is there any way we could do
>> without the :unique_reg?
>>
> Yes:
>
> 1) Add the reference-taking op and register reference PMC to the Parrot
> core.
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 16:19 -0400, Michael Peters wrote:
>> We also need to think about deprecation cycles. If you deprecate a
>> feature in 1 version and then it disappears in the next then the time
>> between when my
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:25 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue Jul 29 11:01:12 2008, particle wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> the failing test:
>> t/steps/auto_ctags-01ok 1/31
>> # Failed test 'Got expected result'
>> # at t/steps/auto_ctags-01.t line 65.
>>
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:28 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have prepared a patch which represents an 'svn diff' between trunk and
> the 'parallel' branch at the point of the branch's inception. Rather
> than swamp your inboxes, I'm posting it here:
>
> http://thenceforward
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Eric Wilhelm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # from Moritz Lenz
> # on Monday 28 July 2008 09:52:
>
>>> That's not -just- with the patch, though, is it? I presume you've
>>> set TEST_JOBS to be something other than '1' ...
>>
>>I've set it to 2, and obeserve the error
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 10:08:06AM -0700, Geoffrey Broadwell wrote:
>> In the source repository, the 'parrot' in runtime/parrot/foo is
>> pointless. It's a singleton directory, and it's redundant.
>
> I think that the
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu Jul 17 15:53:12 2008, julianalbo wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Christoph Otto via RT
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > With this patch, the new tests still pass on Linux/x86. The patch uses
i seem to recall that we agreed instead to noindex the Parrot::
modules... Nobody is expected to use them outside parrot anyway.
On 7/15/08, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 July 2008 17:23:20 James E Keenan wrote:
>
>> Bernhard Schmalhofer wrote:
>
>> > for Parrot 0.6.4 follow
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The file .parrot_current_rev is missing in the Release, and also the
> revision is nowhere
> mentioned in any Release Note, not the ChangeLog and not in news.
> This is annoying, because you don't know if a particular bugfix
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:06 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>$ parrot perl6.pbc --output=buggy.pir --trace=PIR buggy.p6
>
s/trace/target/
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:03 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Second, two notes about the branch:
>>
>> In a fresh checkout, if I 'make renumberops' with no local
>> modifications, src/ops/ops.num changes.
>> If I rename the op store_lex to barf_lex, and run 'make renumberops',
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 7:15 PM, via RT Seneca Cunningham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by "Seneca Cunningham"
> # Please include the string: [perl #56310]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Keenan via RT schrieb:
>>
>> On Fri Jul 13 09:58:33 2007, bernhard wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> There are several config probes that are only used for language
>>> implementations.
>>> Examples are config/auto/m4.pm and c
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Ovid
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Packy Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Jun 18, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Parrot via RT wrote:
>> > Successful parrot build on ancient Debian/i386 system, most of the
>> > way through "make test" (it's taking _forever_, mostl
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Michael Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got this working pretty well on my checkout (except that the current
> revision, #28476, doesn't build). You can do a "make smolder_test" and have
> the
> results sent to the Smolder server. I talked with chromatic
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Bernhard Schmalhofer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:17:33PM -0700, Will Coleda via RT wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Let's borrow the syntax from the makefile generation itself, and just
>>> have RM_F's definition be:
>>>
>>> +rm_f => '@
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Vasily Chekalkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jerry gay wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oops, forgot to attach patch. Now it's really there.
&g
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:16 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> somehow a fresh checkout has resolved the problem
>
> (but my other sandbox was still up to date according to svn status...)
>
> anyhow, this ticket can be rejected.
>
> kjs
>
i had this same problem, and it was "resolved"
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Moritz Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops, forgot to attach patch. Now it's really there.
>
thanks, applied as of r28074.
~jerry
in parrot's main makefile (config/gen/makefiles/root.in) there's a
variable named STICKY_FILES that collects all the files that should be
removed during 'make realclean'. it's an awful name. something more
descriptive, like CONFIGURE_GENERATED_FILES or similar would be
better.
a general going-over
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jonathan Worthington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 01:38:46 +0200
>
> Bob Rogers wrote:
> > It is a good idea. I think I would call it ":class", though.
>
> I did ponder that, and then worried t
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - I'm not sure how accurate or useful the discussion of formal roles is. For
> example, we seem to be doing fine without a pumpking, and this is the only
> place I've ever heard the term "platform porter"
>
for the canonical
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After some administrative snafus, we've finally gotten Andrew's commit
> bit assigned!
>
> I have assigned him several tickets in RT as penance. ^_^
>
wonderful! as a point of introduction, andrew has provided a number of
qual
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:12 AM, via RT Andy Dougherty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Andy Dougherty
> # Please include the string: [perl #53344]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=53344
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Geoffrey Broadwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Subtle note -- the || really wants to be //, but as I recall we're not
> allowed to assume that // is there yet.)
>
correct, parrot depends on perl 5.8, so we can't rely on //.
so i strongly suggest you use the idi
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 6:55 AM, Donald Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build mod_parrot against Parrot 0.6.1 and have found that
> string_nprintf no longer exists. I see from ticket #44053 that the function
> was removed since it had no users.
>
> What's the preferred s
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
>
> > Tonight I resolved RT#52838 and RT#52840, eliminating the
> > saveall/restoreall
> > opcodes, the register stack, and fixing up t
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Mark Glines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:45:22 -0700
> "jerry gay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > also, i'd like to automate more of the release process. currently, we
> > have a period of
one consistent trouble spot in the parrot release process is the CPAN
upload process. often times, we have trouble with perl modules that
have been added, deleted, or renamed causing the release to be marked
as 'unauthorized'. dealing with unauthorized releases involves
intervention from a pause ad
Aloha!
On behalf of the Parrot team, I'm proud to announce Parrot 0.6.1
"Bird of Paradise." Parrot (http://parrotcode.org/) is a virtual machine aimed
at running all dynamic languages.
Parrot 0.6.1 can be obtained via CPAN (soon), or follow the
download instructions at http://parrotcode.org/sourc
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:25 PM, via RT Andy_Bach @ wiwb. uscourts.
gov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> # Please include the string: [perl #52894]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/D
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:03:44 +0200
> > From: François Perrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > <
as of r26974, i've updated the NEWS file for the release. it's been a
busy month, especially for languages. i've updated information on the
languages with which i'm most familiar, but your input is most
welcome. also, could somebody peruse the svn log since the last
release (r26484) and add update
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMCC's macro processor doesn't currently allow for uniquely generated
> variable names. It's in the pdd (19), but not yet implemented.
>
> You're right in that it only works for labels.
>
> kjs
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 14
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 7:36 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30:50 Bob Rogers wrote:
>
> >From: "James Keenan via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 19:13:01 -0700
> >
> >But here is a patch which partially implements the object
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:01:50PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
> > On Sunday 13 April 2008 11:26:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Modified:
> > >trunk/src/main.c
> > >
> > > Log:
> > > [gettext] setup get
thanks for the reports. i needed some feedback on this step in order
to make it more portable.
in order to do this correctly, i needed to determine if GNU libc is
installed. from the gettext overview
(http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/gettext.html#Overview):
Note that on GNU systems,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:15 PM, via RT Bernhard Schmalhofer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by Bernhard Schmalhofer
> # Please include the string: [perl #52776]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I notice that C is deprecated in favor of "methods on the
> ParrotIO object" (per RT #48589), but I can't figure out what. Is this
> because the new methods have not been implemented yet? TIA,
>
precisely. allison and i
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 13:25:33 -0400
>
>
>
> From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2008 09:52:34 -0700
>
> ... compounded by the fact that I can't
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:20 PM, Allison Randal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Joshua McAdams wrote:
>
> >
> > > > The dorms that we have this year have large common areas that we have
> > > > 24x7 access too. I can investigate them more if I need too.
> > >
> > > This would be excellent. If t
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Klaas-Jan Stol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have some remarks/proposals on the current PDD 19 (PIR).
> It already is full with proposals and issues that must be resolved
> before it can be pushed out of draft status, but I figured now is the
> time (as
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Christian Aperghis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andy Dougherty a écrit :
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Christian Aperghis-Tramoni wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I have exactly the same problem under a Debian system.
> > > Configure works properly but make ends with the sam
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Bob Rogers
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:53:25 -0500
>
>
>On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 02:48:11PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
>> On Thursday 27 March 2008 18:20:21 Patrick R. Michaud wrot
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:42 PM, via RT Seneca Cunningham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # New Ticket Created by "Seneca Cunningham"
> # Please include the string: [perl #52220]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Patrick R. Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 09:32:46PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Modified:
> >trunk/apps/p3/cgi-pir/slides.pir
> >trunk/compilers/past-pm/PAST/Node.pir
> >trunk/compilers/past-pm/POST/Node.pir
>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:43 AM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed Mar 26 07:27:44 2008, coke wrote:
> > On feather, when running 'make test', the following tests both hang in
> > an svn checkout:
> >
> > t/postconfigure/03-revision.t # hangs after test 4
> > t/postconfig
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Will Coleda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:21 AM, jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:34 PM, James Keenan via RT
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > &g
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:30 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 March 2008 21:01:41 Will Coleda via RT wrote:
>
> > On Sat Dec 01 14:22:59 2007, coke wrote:
> > > from DEPRECATED.pod
>
> > > The PMC union struct is deprecated and will be removed once all core PMCs
> > > ha
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:34 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri Mar 21 19:23:13 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > No, and it appears not be part of Bundle::Parrot on CPAN, either. We'll
> > have to rectify this.
> >
>
> Coke asked me to pose this question for general
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 9:39 PM, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 23 March 2008 20:58:24 jerry gay wrote:
>
> > why not put the location of parrot's lib dir in
> > Parrot::Config::Generated, and look it up when needed?
>
> Isn't Parrot:
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 6:21 PM, James Keenan via RT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat Mar 22 10:38:42 2008, doughera wrote:
>
> > Just be careful that 'use lib' doesn't look outside of the parrot source
> > tree. If pmc2c.pl is normally invoked from the root directory, then
> > ../lib and ..
1 - 100 of 517 matches
Mail list logo
